find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Inglorious bastards

Inglorious bastards

Michael Bradley has earned his stripes by dumping on big law firms. However, a recent High Court judgment shows that even those keeping the bastards honest can be bastards.

Michael Bradley has earned his stripes by dumping on big law firms. However, a recent High Court judgment shows that even those keeping the bastards honest can be bastards.

Michael Bradley, the managing partner of Marque Lawyers, speaks his mind.

This is in contrast to the cloak of conservatism that often drapes itself over senior partners when they talk to the media.

That is not Bradley’s way. He is willing to put noses out of joint to speak passionately and honestly on important issues such as depression, diversity and what is wrong with the big law firm model.

Try some of these quotes for size when talking about depression.

“To have any hope of achieving progress with this problem, we have to name the cause. And it's very obvious. Our profession just doesn't want to say it,” wrote Bradley in Lawyers Weekly in 2011.

“The cause is the institutional, corporatised, mercenary and singularly money-driven culture which has been created over the past few decades and permeates every aspect of how most law firms run. Timesheets are awful, soulless things, but they are a symptom, not the central cause.”

Lawyers Weekly has long admired Bradley’s no-holds-barred approach to confronting problems such as this head on.

He is a passionate and articulate advocate for important changes that need to be made in the profession.

The private practice arm of the Australian legal sector would be better if we had more people of a similar stature to Bradley speaking out.

Such forthright commentary has earned the founder of Marque Lawyers a media profile that is the envy of many managing partners at much larger firms.

He has a regular column in the Australian Financial Review and his name and face is one of the most recognisable in the Australian legal profession.

He also practices what he preaches.

Marque Lawyers does not use timesheets and three of the firm’s seven partners are female.

It also has a retinue of respected lawyers doing high quality work for a large list of small and large corporate clients.

Bradley combines business nous with compassion and innovation and he has done a magnificent job in boosting his profile and that of Marque since he founded the firm five years ago.

Part of Bradley’s appeal is that he has put ethics at the heart of how he and his firm operates.

That hard-won reputation is now somewhat clouded by the judgment of the High Court in a litigation matter involving Marque and Norton Rose Fulbright (NRF).

Last week, Lawyers Weekly reported that on 6 November a unanimous verdict from a partial bench of five High Court justices found that Marque had to return 13 documents it had inadvertently received from NRF as part of the discovery process in the litigation matter.

Bradley had refused to hand the documents back when asked by NRF.

Litigation is a hard-nosed business and by instructing his firm not to release those documents, Bradley was playing hardball.

The High Court judgment meant that Bradley’s high-risk tactic backfired spectacularly.

Citing Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules, the High Court essentially said a solicitor should return materials where disclosure was inadvertent.

“It is an example of the professional, ethical obligations of legal practitioners supporting the objectives of the proper administration of justice,” the High Court said.

Bradley should have handed the 13 documents back when first asked by NRF litigation partner Stephen Klotz.

If he had done so, he would have saved a lot of money and also not had his reputation and personal judgement questioned.

Of course, such lines between success and failure, particularly when it comes to litigation, are fine.

Four eminent NSW justices ruled differently on the matter prior to the High Court.

A decision of a single judge of the NSW Supreme Court found that Marque had to return nine of the disputed documents, with the NSW Court of Appeal then allowing Marque to keep all of the 13 documents.

Despite that, the High Court decision is final and, in the wash-up, Marque won some battles but lost the war.

Marque Lawyers still provides a template for how a law firm can be successful without flogging its staff in the process.

However, the High Court ruling has put a dent in Bradley’s reputation as a senior legal figure who defies convention and is motivated by a higher set of ideals.
 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Inglorious bastards
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...