find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Queensland dog laws need more bite

Queensland dog laws need more bite

Bruce Simmonds

After a vicious dog attack on a former Gold Coast city councillor, pressure is growing to require dog owners to have public liability insurance, writes Bruce Simmonds.

Current Queensland laws generally allow every dog to get one 'free' bite, but the law is poorly structured and needs to be toughened so a dog owner is held responsible in town settings for any and all actions by their dogs.

The issue has regularly made headlines in Queensland over the years, with vicious dogs attacking people in the streets and public parks.

It is back in the news again after Susie Douglas, a high-profile Gold Coast city councillor between 2004 and 2012, was chased down a suburban street by an eight-month-old crossbreed bull-mastiff last week, as it repeatedly savaged her. Ms Douglas was hospitalised with bite wounds to her back, buttocks, calves and legs.

The attack happened when Ms Douglas, who intends standing for council next year, was campaigning door-to-door in a Gold Coast suburb

The dog was later surrendered to the council’s dog control officers and destroyed by the council.

The attack also renews a call I made last year for owners of dangerous dogs to be legally required to pay up, to ensure dog attack victims’ medical costs are covered.

Why should owners of dangerous dogs be exempted from having to insure against their dogs' behaviour? Anyone whose activities could endanger the public is required to have public liability insurance cover. The cost of dog insurance would be a pointed reminder to dog owners of their responsibilities.

I have acted for numerous dog bite victims in compensation claims and feel the public does not necessarily appreciate the ongoing trauma victims suffer from dog attacks.

In some respects, the attack on Susie Douglas puts a public face on Gold Coast dog attack victims who too often are treated almost as just a statistic. What if the victim here was a child or a baby? Our Queensland dog laws are too lax.

Dog owners in town settings should be responsible for all actions of their dog. If they can't look after it they shouldn't have one. A dog should not be able to leave its home property to attack passers-by. In the country if a dog bit a person or stock it would be shot.

I believe Queensland should adopt the New South Wales system where owners are automatically liable for their dog’s behaviour and can be fined or even jailed if they ignore their responsibilities.

In Queensland, even though a dog is allowed to have a first bite before it can be classed as dangerous, you still have to show negligence in not containing the animal.

There’s no real criminal liability here although certain dangerous breeds are banned, as they should be. But the dog laws system is still soft and needs strengthening.

We should have a system that says you must have compulsory third-party insurance when registering your dog. If the dog bites someone, there’s automatic liability on the dog’s owner.

The system could also provide for a substantial fine and the dog’s destruction if the dog’s insurance or registration lapses.

Responsible owners will follow the rules; it’s the irresponsible or careless ones we need to target.

It should be that if a person can’t insure their dog, then they can’t have a dog, just as you can’t legally drive a car if there’s no CTP insurance.

Bruce Simmonds is a partner and litigation director at Gold Coast law firm Parker Simmonds Solicitors & Lawyers. This article was prepared with the assistance of solicitor Zoe Ford.


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Queensland dog laws need more bite
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
protest
06:05
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
06:04
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Warning
06:03
Lawyers warn against mandatory sentencing measures amid political jeers
Mandatory sentencing has become a topic for politicians on both sides of Federal Parliament to jostl...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...