find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
The privilege to know and the duty to act

The privilege to know and the duty to act

Bill Potts

Lawyers have an obligation to take action on the issue of Indigenous incarceration rates, writes Bill Potts.

As lawyers, we represent and act for some of the most disadvantaged people in our community. It is imperative that we take concrete steps to improve the circumstances of disadvantaged members of our society, specifically our Indigenous people, who are excessively over-represented in Australian jails.

Lawyers see this disadvantage first-hand, but we also have a voice. We have the privilege to know, and therefore we have the duty to speak and to act.

What we are currently seeing is the over-representation of Indigenous people in jail, more deaths in custody and the under-representation of Indigenous people within our justice system.

It’s been 24 years since the Mabo decision, 20 years since the last significant report on Indigenous deaths in custody, 18 years since the advent of National Sorry Day (26 May), and seven years since Australia gave its formal support to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

So why do I get the feeling that not much has changed?

Because no amount of legal expression of sorrow or regret, though appropriate, is going to be effective without concrete steps to ensure that some of the most vulnerable people in our society are dealt with equitably and fairly.

One concrete step we have welcomed in Queensland is the re-opening of the Murri Court in our justice system.

The first of 13 Murri courts was formally launched in Rockhampton on 13 April as part of the government’s election commitment to reinstate diversionary court options for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) people in Queensland.

Murri courts first began in 2002 in response to the disproportionate number of ATSI people incarcerated in Queensland jails, but were axed in 2012.

These courts provide access to culturally competent service providers and referral pathways to address the underlying causes of criminality. They have proven their worth in diverting people from the criminal justice system.

A Murri court is a Queensland Magistrates Court that is available to sentence eligible ATSI offenders who have pleaded guilty. It is presided over by a magistrate, and supported by local elders or respected persons who provide cultural advice to the magistrate.

I hope that, as in Victoria, the Murri court concept will in time be extended to the District Court.

The ‘concrete step’ I would yet like to see is true Indigenous representation within the judiciary. Of the 90 or so magistrates in Queensland, the merest handful – four, I believe – can claim an indigenous heritage. For the judges of the District Court and Supreme Court, there is zero Indigenous representation, to the best of my knowledge.

While appointments to the judiciary should always be based on merit, more thought needs to be given to ensuring that it reflects the diverse composition and makeup of our society.

I believe that we have the opportunity to use our voices to speak and act for those most disadvantaged in our community.

Bill Potts is a director of Potts Lawyers and president of the Queensland Law Society.

 


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The privilege to know and the duty to act
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Jackie Rhodes
Dec 12 2017
Report sheds light on LGBTQI inclusion in law firms
A recent report has revealed the varying perceptions on LGBTQI diversity and inclusion in the Austra...
Women in business
Dec 12 2017
Annabel Crabb headlines Women in Business Forum
Political journalist Annabel Crabb has appeared at the Coleman Greig Lawyers Women in Business Forum...
Dec 11 2017
Warm welcome for new district court judges
Three practitioners who were appointed as district court judges in WA have been congratulated by ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...