find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
A look at the legalities of the Essendon air crash

A look at the legalities of the Essendon air crash

Essendon

The release of the preliminary findings of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau into the crash of the King Air B200, VH-ZCR, into the DFO shopping outlet on 21 February of this year is likely to raise more questions than answers into what the cause or causes of the accident have been, writes Thomas Janson.

What did the Australian Transport Safety Bureau find?

Frustratingly for family members and the investigators, due to the substantial damage that the wreckage of the aircraft suffered, there is still no definitive cause or causes revealing what triggered the air crash.

In addition, the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) unit of the aircraft did not record for the duration of the flight, and therefore, investigators do not have access to crucial audio information from the pilot and the passengers to help reveal what may have caused the air crash nor are they able to hear noise and sounds from inside the cockpit and outside of the aircraft recorded by the CVR regarding the movement of flight instruments or engine noise to name a few.

However, the work of the investigators of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, their US colleagues in the National Transport Safety Bureau and with the assistance of Pratt & Whitney (the manufacturer of the aircraft’s engines), managed to reveal that at the present stage of the investigation the suggested ‘catastrophic engine failure’ was not due to pre-impact failure of the internal components within the engine nor did on-site investigation of the wreckage showed the existence of any pre-existing faults within the aircraft that contributed to the accident.

What are the next steps for the Australian Transport Safety Bureau?

With the release of their preliminary findings, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau have narrowed their search for the causes of the air crash into a review of maintenance documents relating to the air crash, sifting through witness statements of the air crash, analysing the piloting history of the pilot and concentrating on analysing specific aircraft components, such as the engine propellers of the aircraft.

This will culminate in the Australian Transport Safety Bureau releasing their final report which will reveal the cause or causes of the air crash by 21 February 2018.

What does this mean for families?

Unfortunately, the preliminary findings of the Australian Transport Bureau have not as yet been able to narrow the range of possibilities for the cause of the crash to a specific factor or factors.

This means that the legal avenues for the families of the passenger remain constrained to bringing a strict liability action under the Civil Aviation (Carrier’s Liability) Act 1959 (Cth) against the company holding the licence to operate the flight until the responsible party or parties for the cause or causes of the air crash are discovered.

An action under the Civil Aviation (Carrier’s Liability) Act 1959 (Cth) can be brought by the relatives of the passengers and is an action that might be brought for dependency (meaning a family member or members can recover compensation if they are financially dependent upon one of the deceased passengers) and/or nervous shock (meaning that a family member or members can recover compensation if they have suffered a recognised psychiatric illness as diagnosed by a psychiatrist).

Such actions must be commenced by 20 February 2019 due to a strict two-year limitation period.

Conclusion

Ultimately, we must all await the final findings of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau as to what has been the definitive cause or causes of this air crash in order to prevent similar tragedies from occurring.

Thomas Janson is Shine Lawyers' aviation lawyer. He leads the firm's transport/aviation practice.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

A look at the legalities of the Essendon air crash
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...