find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Three common client access mistakes

Three common client access mistakes

Promoted by

Client access gives firms a competitive advantage when done properly, writes Stephen Butler, CEO of Red Rain

TO IMPROVE service and reduce costs, many firms are adopting client access platforms – systems that share selected information with clients. However, like any new technology, it has potential to cause headaches. And unlike most staff - facing systems, client access solutions can directly affect your firm’s reputation. So, if you’re implementing client access, it’s important to get it right. As the service is starting to gain traction, there are a number of traps to look out for when considering a new solution.


1. It won’t scale for growth

This is a common mistake made by small to mid-sized firms. There are many systems that require significant effort to maintain. Drag and drop, inputting data or creating Excel reports seems simple in a demonstration, but what will happen when you need to do this 50 or 100 times a day? Ensure your system can scale, as the use of client-access technology often brings about repeat and referral business due to its ‘shiny and new’ effect.


2. It’s a one-size-fits-all solution

Different clients have varied needs – from the information they access, to the devices they use. Corporate clients require multiple users to access many documents and reports. Ensure your client access system can create different security profiles and doesn’t involve a complex set-up – browser-based access is best. Meanwhile, private clients will only need to access one or two documents, often when they’re out and about, e.g. at court or a property inspection – a mobile app is perfect for this.


3. It relies on the client

Unless you make things incredibly easy, clients simply won’t use new technology. Your client access platform shouldn’t rely on them to constantly ‘check in’. Ensure your system can automate responses – document changes should send an email or push notification, and recurring automated reports are essential for corporate clients.

Small features like these don’t cost your firm a thing, but demonstrate your value to the client and ensure they are properly using the service. If you do your research, client access solutions will give your firm a massive competitive advantage. Most firms using RedView Connect, our client access platform, say they enjoy a clear point of differentiation and reduced client service costs. 


RedView helps law firms and their clients access information and documents from any device. Visit for more information.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Three common client access mistakes
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...