find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Digital disruption and its impact on legal research

Digital disruption and its impact on legal research

Promoted by

 

How new technology is changing the way lawyers conduct research and collaborate within their firm

WITH THE entry of a new generation of digital-native lawyers into the workforce and pressures on law firms, in-house counsel and the justice system to become more streamlined and cost-efficient, technology has become integral to work practices. A significant part of this focus has been on administrative and back-end tasks, streamlining or outsourcing repetitive tasks to increase productivity and deliver legal services more efficiently.

But is this at the cost of the quality of work and research they are producing? Legal research is being transformed with online search engines influencing user experience. With the digital-native lawyers expecting their knowledge management tools to work in much the same way as Google and Facebook interfaces do, and with graduate tech-savvy lawyers starting to outgrow the generation of traditional research practices, research relevancy and search algorithms need to be updated and optimised for new search practices.

The ease in accessing information also brings increased expectations in its presentation and delivery. When relying on open search sources, rather than trusted publishers, this creates a problem and mismatch of information.

At a recent LexisNexis roundtable exploring ‘whether research tools are evolving with the changing needs and expectations of the legal profession’, the participants all agreed that lawyers are utilising Google more for research but quite often at the expense of results, perhaps presenting incorrect or less thorough research that typically results in the research request ending up with the knowledge manager or librarian to pursue through more traditional research methods.

Roundtable participants agreed that in many cases, utilising tools like Google was costing the business time and money on incomplete or inaccurate results.

All participants observed that legal research was a personalised process. The point was made that while some lawyers are sophisticated online researchers with a sound understanding of information literacy principles, there are others who are desperate to find an answer and skip essential legal research steps for convenience.

They felt that rather than using Google as a stand-alone platform, or forcing practitioners to only use company developed and approved research tools, it is a matter of taking those accustomed principles, search practices, and mixing it with an education of information literacy principles.

Since the LexisNexis technology journey started to address the changing research needs of users, there have been consistent and clear themes in research and user testing, such as the need for ‘natural language’ searching to support the ‘Boolean challenged’ researchers and the expectation of finding the right results in the first 10 search hits (search relevancy).

While Google significantly affected researcher’s expectation of the search experience, the rapid development of social and online media is influencing both the approach to research and expectations for sharing/collaboration on legal information

This is where technology companies such as LexisNexis can help: by continuously working with customers, tools that mimic a more simplified and filtered search are developed, creating research platforms that use natural language while ensuring research is thorough and equipping the firms with efficiency and collaboration tools.

Lexis Advance, the new legal research platform from LexisNexis launched in Australia last year, is the direct response to the growing trends towards new ways to conduct legal research and collaborate within the firm.

For more industry insight and perspectives on digital disruption in the legal industry, you can download the full white paper from the News and Resources section of Lexis Advance website: www.lexisnexis.com.au/lexisadvance

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Digital disruption and its impact on legal research
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...