find the latest legal job
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Judicial complaints face new scrutiny

Judicial complaints face new scrutiny

Bringing men and women in wigs into account has become the end-game for a host of politicians and legal representative bodies in recent years. Now, finally, they are getting somewhere.

BRINGING men and women in wigs into account has become the end-game for a host of politicians and legal representative bodies in recent years. Now, finally, they are getting somewhere. 


A federal Labor politician has now made his mark on the cause, introducing a Private Members Bill to fill what he says is a vacuum in the law when it comes to dealing with complaints against judges. 


The Hon. Duncan Kerr SC said the Bill is set to create a fair process when Parliament is called on.


The Parliamentary (Judicial Misbehaviour or Incapacity) Commission Bill 2010 aims to give some certainty to Parliament when considering rare cases of judicial impropriety. 


“Serious allegations were made against Justice Kirby during his term on the bench—and but for their quick disproof Parliament would not have been ready to deal with that controversy. 


"It would be the same now if concerns arose about a federal justice with a long history of failing to submit tax returns, falling asleep regularly or suffering failing mental health if that judge or magistrate refused well intentioned requests to retire,” Kerr said.


He said the case of Justice Lionel Murphy in the early 1980s first highlighted the need for there to be a clear and consistent method for dealing with any alleged misconduct by federal judges. 


“This Bill and proposed changes to Standing Orders fill a hole in the legal system where the law is silent,” Kerr said.


The Bill applies to any of the 145 judges now serving on any of the four Federal courts – the High Court, Federal Court, Federal Magistrates Court and Family Court – as well as any judges that would be created within a new Military Court.  


Any MP bringing frivolous or malicious baseless accusations against a judge will be guilty of serious contempt of Parliament. 


A motion seeking the removal of a judge would have to set out specific allegations. Those allegations would then be sent to an independent Parliamentary Commission for investigation and report back to the Parliament. The House and the Senate would retain their exclusive constitutional powers. It will remain open to the Parliament to accept or reject any recommendation for the removal of a justice.


Kerr said these are issues that demanded clear thinking and certainty, "not a head in the sand".


“We all hope it will be rare where Parliament must consider having to make decisions to remove a judge or magistrate – but it is short term  thinking to wish the possibility away. It is sensible to decide in advance how those matters will be dealt with so that there can be no suggestion that the process is biased for or against the interests of any particular justice.

 

“This Bill is not about transferring powers or lording parliamentary power over the judiciary – it simply aims to establish a clear and fair path to give effect to s72 of the constitution.


Kerr said would be seeking the support of the Attorney General, the Opposition and crossbenches to pass the bill in coming Parliamentary session.

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Judicial complaints face new scrutiny
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 24 2017
Demand lifts in 2017/18 for short-term finance to cover crises
Promoted by NWC Finance. The first five months of the 2017-18 financial year have seen unpreceden...
LCA welcomes religious freedom panel
Nov 24 2017
LCA welcomes religious freedom panel
The Law Council of Australia says the establishment of a panel which will examine the human right to...
Law Society launched a new website, legal politics and lawmaking
Nov 24 2017
Law Society launches project to engage young Aussies
The Law Society of NSW has launched a new website to engage young Australians in legal politics and ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...