find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Uncertainty as HC reserves decision on gay marriage

Uncertainty as HC reserves decision on gay marriage

Same-sex marriages due to take place in Canberra this weekend are in doubt after the High Court reserved its decision on the Commonwealth’s challenge to ACT gay marriage laws.

The High Court is still considering the challenge, which has accused the ACT of enacting laws that are inconsistent with the federal Marriage Act 1961.

The Court has reserved its decision until next Thursday (12 December).

The ACT Legislative Assembly passed the laws in late October and the first weddings are due to take place on Saturday.

According to ACT Attorney-General Simon Corbell, same-sex couples planning to get married in Canberra this weekend can still do so because the Commonwealth did not seek an injunction.

However, ABC News reported that Corbell said the marriages could be deemed invalid when the High Court hands down its judgment next week.

Various legal bodies, including Australian Lawyers for Human Rights, have expressed support for changing the Marriage Act to allow same-sex unions.

 

The arguments

In its submission to the High Court, the Commonwealth admitted that the full scope of the power to legislate all forms of marriage has yet to be determined in the Constitution. It argued, however, that “the better view is that the constitutional concept of ‘marriage’ includes a marriage between members of the same sex”.

The Commonwealth also claimed that the Marriage Act was intended to cover the entire field of marriage in Australia and prevents any state or territory from conferring the legal status of marriage if it is inconsistent with the federal Act.

“It is not open under the law of Australia for any other legislature to purport to clothe with the legal status of marriage (or a form of marriage) a union of persons, whether mimicking or modifying any of [the] essential requirements of marriage,” it said in the submission.

The ACT government, on the other hand, has claimed that the Marriage Act only covers heterosexual couples and does not explicitly prohibit state or territory laws from conferring the status of marriage on same-sex unions.

The Marriage Amendment Act 2004 defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others voluntarily entered into for life, which the ACT government has argued limits the scope of the federal legislation.

 

State of play

Other than the ACT, Tasmania is the only other state or territory to have passed same-sex marriage laws in a house of parliament. The state’s lower house voted in favour (13 to 11 votes) of a Bill to legalise gay marriage in September 2012, but rejected it a few weeks later in the upper house by a vote of eight to six.

A bid to legalise gay marriage was also rejected by the NSW upper house last month, with MPs in the Legislative Council voting against it by 21 votes to 19.

In 2011, the Labor Party changed its platform to support the legalisation of gay marriage and launched an inquiry into the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2012 and the Marriage Amendment Bill 2012. The bills were introduced into parliament in 2012, but both were overwhelming defeated by a conscience vote.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Uncertainty as HC reserves decision on gay marriage
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...