find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
SA barristers fight for recognition

SA barristers fight for recognition

The South Australian Bar Association is pushing to have barristers recognised in state legislation, a move opposed by the state’s law society.

South Australia's Legal Practitioners Act 1981 does not acknowledge the Bar Association and calls for a fused legal profession with no distinction between barristers and solicitors.

Section 6(3) of the Act says any undertaking to practise solely as a barrister or solely as a solicitor is held to be “contrary to public policy and void”, although exceptions exist for lawyers under contract and silks.

SA Bar Association president Andrew Harris QC said barristers formed an established speciality in South Australia, which should be acknowledged by the legislation.

“Over the past 50 years that the Bar Association has been in existence, [there has been] a recognition that advocacy is a specialist skill,” he said.

“That’s not to deny the existence of advocacy skills in law firms – but most law firms these days aren’t generalists. [Law firms] themselves specialise in particular areas of the law because the nature of legal practice has changed.”

In regards to section 6(3), Mr Harris said the legislation was internally inconsistent and failed to reflect modern practice.

“Section 6 as a whole is a dog’s breakfast,” he said. “It's not ideal that the legislation that concerns legal practitioners in this state exhibits such poor legislative drafting and is so far removed from the reality of day-to-day legal practice in 2015.”

The Bar Association has made a submission to the state's attorney-general, John Rau, calling for section 6(3) to be removed, for the terms barrister and Bar Association to be defined, for barristers to be bound by the Bar Association's professional conduct rules and for the association to be granted a right of audience in hearings concerning its members.

In its initial submission in response, the Law Society of South Australia rejected all the above proposals except the suggestion to scrap section 6(3).

“The effect of such a repeal might be a passive legislative recognition of the now well-established practice of signing the Bar Roll and the undertaking accompanying it,” the submission said.

However, just four months later, the Law Society reversed its previous stance, influenced by a letter from former SA attorney-general and opposition leader Chris Sumner.

Mr Sumner argued section 6(3) was designed to preserve law as a fused profession, which made legal representation less expensive and more accessible.

His argument swayed Law Society president Rocco Perrotta, who wrote to Mr Rau that the society's previous position had been “misconceived”.

“The mischief s6(3) can be seen to avoid appears to be the, in effect, irrevocable undertaking to practice as either a solicitor or barrister. Such undertaking would be inconsistent with our fused profession and the admission process in this State, which sees all practitioners qualified as barristers and solicitors.”

Mr Harris disputed the idea that an independent Bar pushed up the cost of legal services.

“My view is that not only is that incorrect, but the opposite is true,” he said. “The best place for people with skills as a specialist advocate is the Bar."

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

SA barristers fight for recognition
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Dec 15 2017
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...