find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Barristers 'not competition' for migration agents

Barristers 'not competition' for migration agents

passport migration

Members of the WA Bar have called for a closer working relationship between barristers and migration agents, including more direct briefing.

Matthew Howard, barrister and vice-president of the WA Bar Association, suggested migration agents and barristers were not competing for clients.

“The great thing from the migration agents' point of view is that the barristers are not looking to make the clients their own clients,” he said.

“There's no competition for the client – that's not the model we work under. We're not looking to pinch the client or interfere with that relationship.”

Rather, he suggested, migration agents could work more closely with barristers to take advantage of their advice and advocacy expertise.

Typically, barristers are brought in at the appeals stage of a migration case, but Mr Howard suggested they could play a larger role, offering advice or appearing before tribunals.

“If you put migration agents in the position of solicitors, then what the Bar can offer migration agents is an add-on – the ability to access advocacy or advice that is an added resource on a particular case,” he said.

The complexity of the migration legislation – including the oft-amended Migration Act as well as ministerial directives – meant migration agents are increasingly in need of expert legal advice, he suggested.

He encouraged the Bar to promote direct briefing to migration agents, who were often unaware of the options.

“I think [there] might have been an idea that they had to go through a solicitor, and no doubt there will be cases where there should be a solicitor,” he said. 

“But for some of these things that’s not necessary, and the Bar Rules now all allow for a direct brief in the appropriate cases.”

The view was echoed by WA barrister Jason Raftos, who is also a registered migration agent and works across migration and employment cases.

Both Mr Howard and Mr Raftos will be speaking on the topic at the Migration Institute of Australia’s National Conference held in Perth at the end of the October.

“Agents are entitled to appear at the [Migration Review Tribunal] and the Refugee Tribunal. But they might prefer to brief a barrister to do it because advocacy is our thing,” Mr Raftos said.

“If you're going to have lay people as [migration] agents, then it's a good thing that they can work with barristers because they're going to have questions which they may need extra specialist advice on.”

However, he said his experience showed few migration agents were aware of direct briefing, with most of his work funnelled through solicitors.

He speculated that costs may be an issue, but also suggested direct briefing may encourage more migrants to seek expert legal advice.

“The best option is to have a solicitor involved, but there are costs implications – I'd rather they come directly to us than not at all,” he said.

He reiterated Mr Howard’s view that barristers were a complement, not a challenge, to migration agents.

“As a barrister, I'm not competition to migration agents. We do a particular piece of work on instruction from the instructor,” he said.

Like this story? Subscribe to our free newsletter and receive Lawyers Weekly every day straight to your inbox.


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Barristers 'not competition' for migration agents
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...