find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
BigLaw name not a prerequisite any longer

BigLaw name not a prerequisite any longer

law firms

More junior lawyers are looking past the brand of BigLaw firms, opting instead to base their choice of employment on whether or not the firm aligns with their core values.

According to a new report, Minding the Gap: Do Today’s Associates Defy Generational Stereotypes, published by Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA Global), out of the 1,200-plus respondents, the vast majority said a firm’s brand is either not a factor or a secondary consideration in the choice of their firm.

Just 26 per cent said selecting a firm based on their brand is a primary consideration.

Moreover, feedback on whether a change in a firm’s brand would prompt an associate’s departure is inconclusive, although the number of respondents dismissing that possibility has outnumbered those who “would” or “might” leave their firms in such an eventuality, the report said.

The junior lawyers have also been asked their opinion as to whether or not their firm’s brand is well defined.

While the above results demonstrate that this is not a deciding factor for the majority of junior lawyers, 42.92 per cent of the respondents agree that the firm’s brand is well defined, 26.99 per cent said they strongly agree, 18.58 per cent said they neither agree nor disagree, 9.29 per cent said they disagree and 2.21 per cent said they strongly disagree that their firm’s brand is well defined.

Separately, the report also asked respondents about their loyalty to their firm.

According to the results, 46.90 per cent of respondents describe themselves as moderately loyal to their firm, while 23.01 per cent describe themselves as highly loyal.

Meanwhile, 16.91 per cent of respondents said loyalty is irrelevant in a law firm context and 13.27 per cent describe themselves as neither loyal nor disloyal to their firm.

The report also touched on the goals of the junior lawyers surveyed, asking them how important they value their firm’s transparency regarding associate career paths.

Out of the respondents, 30.10 per cent highlighted transparency in regard to this as very important, while 29.13 per cent said important, 18.45 per cent said crucial, 14.56 per cent said somewhat important and 7.77 per cent said unimportant.

The survey also asked respondents what they would like to spend more time doing.

The majority, 37.62 per cent said they’d like to spend more time doing business development. A further 18.81 per cent said training, 12.87 per cent said work outside their practice group, 9.90 per cent said pro bono, 6.83 per cent said mentorship and 3.96 per cent said firm social events.

To view other insights into this report, click here.


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

BigLaw name not a prerequisite any longer
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...