find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Spare a thought for those convicted under the Witchcraft Act 1735

Spare a thought for those convicted under the Witchcraft Act 1735

Iain Miller

Do you ever feel caught out by a silly or obsolete law? asks Iain Miller.

If so, consider yourself lucky that you were not in the unenviable position of Ms Helen Duncan, a celebrated medium who was one of the last people convicted under the Witchcraft Act 1735 following a trial which took place in England during World War II.

Helen Duncan (nee MacFarlane) was born on 25 November 1897 in Scotland and quickly came to recognise her supernatural talent. By 1926 she had developed into a medium offering séances in which she summoned spirits.

Controversy followed her career throughout the 1920s and 1930s, with several attempts to discredit her through use of x-rays and scientific examination of the ectoplasm that she would regurgitate, among other things.

By the close of the 1930s there had been concerted efforts to establish her as a fraud, and she had been prosecuted and fined on a number of occasions. However, Ms Duncan had a large number of supporters and continued hosting séances.

Ms Duncan came to the interest of the authorities in 1941, following the sinking of the HMS Barham during wartime. The sinking had supposedly been kept secret, with only relatives of casualties having been informed (some 861 people), before the general public in late January 1942.

However, in November 1941 Ms Duncan held a séance in Portsmouth during which a spirit of a sailor materialised and told her (and the audience) that the HMS Barham had been sunk.

On the night of 19 January 1944, police raided one of Ms Duncan’s séances and she was arrested.

Ms Duncan was initially arrested under section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1842, which was a relatively minor offence. However, the authorities regarded the matter more seriously, perhaps because they were afraid that Ms Duncan might reveal classified information, particularly with the D-Day Normandy landings approaching, regardless of the nature of her source.

Eventually Ms Duncan was prosecuted with offences relating to the Witchcraft Act 1735 which made it a crime, among other things, for a person to claim that any human being had magical powers or was guilty of practising witchcraft. The maximum penalty set out by the act was a year’s imprisonment.

The trial itself was a major affair lasting seven days, despite its wartime setting. It drew the attention of Mr Winston Churchill himself, who expressed his dismay at what he saw as the misuse of resources of the court in the circumstances.

During the course of the trial, Ms Duncan was barred by the judge from demonstrating her alleged powers as part of her defence against being fraudulent. Most evidence was given by way of witness testimony, much of which was supportive of Ms Duncan.

Ms Duncan herself was asked to give evidence so that the prosecution could cross-examine her. However, her defence lawyers pointed out that as Ms Duncan was in a trance during the séances, she would not be able to answer questions as to what transpired.

Despite the best endeavours of her defence team, the jury found that Ms Duncan had contravened the Witchcraft Act 1735. She was ultimately sentenced to nine months imprisonment, being released on about 22 September 1944.

The Witchcraft Act was finally repealed in 1951.

Iain Miller is a senior lawyer in the medical negligence team at Stacks Goudkamp.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Spare a thought for those convicted under the Witchcraft Act 1735
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...