find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
‘SportsTech’ posing legal challenges: report

‘SportsTech’ posing legal challenges: report

Around the Grounds – SportsTech: Digital Disruption

A report by King & Wood Mallesons has identified some of the key challenges that technological advancements are presenting for sports and entertainment lawyers.

The report titled, Around the Grounds – SportsTech: Digital Disruption in the Sports Industry, discusses legal issues associated with digital disruption in sport adjudication, safety and spectatorship, as well as the rapidly growing e-sports industry.

The report was led by KWM partners Michael Swinson and Scott Bouvier, with contributions from senior associate Nick Sinclair, solicitors Nick Baum, Matthew Gardner and Daniella Phair, and graduate Louise Yun.

“Technological development is rapidly changing almost every facet of the sports industry – from the way sports are played and the equipment players use, to the way sports are governed and, of course, the ways that we spectators watch and enjoy the on-field action,” the report said.

“All of these changes raise interesting new legal questions and challenges. However, developments in the law are often accused of lagging behind developments in technology – courts and legislators often struggle to keep up with what is happening in the ‘real world’.”

Sports adjudication has become heavily reliant on technology. Tools such as video replay, Hawkeye and Hotspot are widely used to augment – and sometimes overrule – the judgement of human referees and umpires.

Automated systems are continually being revised to become capable of making more complex decisions. This involves reducing complex judgement calls to a series of binary questions that a computer is capable of assessing.

“The challenge for sports administrators is to determine the right level of adjudication by technology, taking into account fan expectations, broadcasting considerations, cost, accuracy and fairness,” the report said.

Player safety is another high priority. Technological advancements mean the physical condition of a player can now be monitored during a game, including data such as distance run, heart rate and force of impact. However, reluctance by clubs and administrators to implement these technologies could expose them to legal risk.

“If [clubs and administrators] are not willing to adopt new safety technologies, they may potentially face greater legal exposure if one of their athletes is hurt in circumstances that could have potentially been avoided,” the report said.

“For example, the athlete may be able to bring a claim in negligence if it can show that their club or the organising body for their sport owed them a duty of care and failed to discharge that duty by displaying the standard of care that would be expected of a reasonable person in their position.

“The common law has developed a defence based on the voluntary assumption of risk (referred to by the Latin volenti non fit injuria) where a plaintiff deliberately exposes themselves to a known risk.

“However, defences like this may be hard to make out if sports administrators have evidence about the likelihood of risks that is not widely available to players, or have the opportunity to make changes to their sport to avoid or mitigate on-field risks and fail to do so.”

On the spectator side, other sports technologies are firmly embedded in the homes of fans. Recent innovations in broadcasting and viewing include virtual and augmented reality products as well as streaming services, which are complicating relationships between sports organisations, media companies and consumers.

“While the division between free-to-air TV, pay TV and digital coverage may have been relatively easy to draw in the past, this is becoming a far more fraught and contested area,” the report said.

“Who should own virtual reality coverage rights? Who should own in-stadium broadcast rights? When technology is evolving so rapidly, how do you effectively assess the relative value of TV, mobile and other coverage rights over a five-year rights cycle?

“Already we are seeing keen interest by some social media platforms, like Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, in the potential of sports and other live event coverage. These are companies that are adept at exploiting new technologies and creating new audience demand for novel ways of consuming content.

“It may well be that they are better placed to take sports coverage to the next level than traditional broadcasters, who are largely stuck providing a single curated image to their viewers rather than an immersive or interactive experience.”

The issues affecting traditional sports are mirrored in the emerging e-sports space. With competitive video gaming growing in prominence, issues such as player contract terms, intellectual property and gambling regulation are becoming more serious legal concerns.

“Players starting out in e-sports typically have little prior business knowledge and have begun their careers by playing with friends and acquaintances in an environment where written agreements are seen as unnecessary,” the report said.

“As a result of this cultural legacy, individual players who make it to the big-time are often left to fend for themselves when negotiating their engagement by teams and their participation in tournaments.

“The International e-Sports Federation was established back in 2008, but while one of its objectives is to promote competition standards, the adoption of minimum player protections is still a work in progress.

“There is no doubt that the rise of e-sports has stirred up both the sporting and entertainment industries. It remains to be seen whether our existing legal framework is fit to manage this burgeoning industry.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

‘SportsTech’ posing legal challenges: report
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA applauds proposed Modern Slavery Act
The Law Council of Australia has welcomed new recommendations for the development of a Modern Slaver...
Top-tier offers targeted mentoring for Indigenous law students
Students at Macquarie University will be the first to benefit from a new Indigenous mentoring progra...
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...