High Court’s unsafe housing decision triggers class action investigation
A compensation firm said it is investigating a class action over dilapidated rental homes following a landmark High Court decision to hold landlords accountable for unsafe and unhealthy housing.
A compensation firm said it is investigating a class action over dilapidated rental homes following a landmark High Court decision to hold landlords accountable for unsafe and unhealthy housing.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create a free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
The High Court on Wednesday (1 November) unanimously decided the Northern Territory government is liable for compensation to tenants of Ltyentye Apurte, or Santa Teresa, for the distress and disappointment caused by living in inhabitable rental properties.
The lead applicant was living without a back door for more than five years, and over 70 other households complained of issues such as leaking sewage, unstable electricity, and no air conditioning.
The Australian Lawyers for Remote Aboriginal Rights (ALRAR), which ran the case with support from the Grata Fund, said this decision would have wide-ranging ramifications for tenants across the country who are being left to live in unhealthy, unsafe and uncomfortable housing.
ALRAR solicitor Dan Kelly added the judgment confirmed compensation arises from a breach of the tenancy agreement.
“The deplorable state of housing in remote communities, its impacts on health and wellbeing, should not be tolerated in a country as wealthy as Australia. As it stands, legal action is the only way remote communities can enforce their basic rights to habitable housing,” he said.
Partnering with ALRAR, Slater & Gordon has today (2 November) announced it is now investigating a potential class action to seek improvements to public housing in remote communities and financial compensation for the affected Aboriginal tenants.
The class action would also investigate whether group members were entitled to make secondary claims under the Australian Consumer Law and the Racial Discrimination Act for offering a disadvantageous service on the basis of race.
ALRAR and Slater & Gordon visited the sites and observed public housing without working toilets, showers, cooking facilities or safe drinking water. They also reported broken windows, blocked pipes and countless repair requests that were allegedly being ignored.
Slater & Gordon class actions senior associate Gemma Leigh-Dodds said the visits confirmed tenants “have been living in substandard housing with issues such as water that does not pass regulatory guidelines, significant infrastructure issues, sewerage and security issues, and a lack of air conditioning”.
The proposed claim would seek damages for breaches of contract, including repayment of rent, the inconveniences suffered by tenants, any incurred expenses by tenants to fix problems in the house, and disappointment and distress caused by the housing issues.
“For too long, Aboriginal people living in remote communities have been expected to put up and shut up in relation to their housing rights. We are proud to be working with ALRAR to contribute to a suite of public interest litigation demanding better housing justice for Aboriginal people,” Ms Leigh-Dodds said.
Naomi Neilson
Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly.
You can email Naomi at: