find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Briefing counsel: the myths

Briefing counsel: the myths

Laina Chan debunks myths about when lawyers should be briefing counsel._x000D_

Laina Chan debunks myths about when lawyers should be briefing counsel.

At Melbourne TEC Chambers’ inaugural series of seminars held in Perth in May, it became clear that there were some myths surrounding the briefing of counsel. Curiously, there appeared to be a view held in the marketplace that counsel did not wish to be involved in the infancy stages of litigation. This could not be further from the truth.

In an ideal world, litigation would be run efficiently, cost effectively and clients would be perfectly informed about the procedural steps from the inception of proceedings to judgment and enforcement. Witnesses would have faultless memories, keep contemporaneous notes of their conversations, documentary evidence would be neatly filed away and evidence gathering would be a smooth and relatively pain-free exercise. Such is the ideal that the rules of procedure have encapsulated the goal of justice, efficiency and cost-effectiveness as the benchmark against which procedural steps are to be measured against.

Unfortunately, the realities of litigation are generally at odds with the ideal. The high cost of complex technology, engineering and construction (TEC) cases is notorious. Many attempts have been made over recent years to reduce the costs burden through a move away from discovery, alternative dispute resolution and more recently, a renewed emphasis on commercial arbitration. However, as many practitioners are aware, not all disputes are amenable to commercial arbitration. Some disputes require judicial power for their resolution. Furthermore, commercial arbitration in itself may not lead to any particular costs savings.

One seemingly counter-intuitive tool to managing the cost of litigation is to involve a specialist barrister early in the process. Barristers can help formulate the strategy for the entire dispute resolution process by targeting the key issues and dispensing with expensive skirmishes that do little more than escalate costs and aggravate all parties involved.

Melbourne TEC Chambers is running two identical half-day seminars for $295 per half-day session (and accredited for three CPD points) at the Hilton in Brisbane on 19 August 2014.

One of the topics will be ‘How to get more bang for your buck when working with counsel – a step-by-step practical guide to briefing counsel’ which will help dispense the myths around the practice of briefing counsel. Michael Heaton QC, Martin Scott QC, Albert Monichino QC, Caroline Kirton QC and Rob Harper SC, along with senior juniors Don Charrett, Michael Whitten, Ian Percy, Andrew Downie and myself from the Victorian Bar, will provide attendees with their point of view on the following topics:

  • Domestic Arbitration – The Future: New Acts, New Rules and New Attitudes
  • Recent Developments in International Arbitration
  • Penalties in Construction Law after Andrews v ANZ
  • Statutory Adjudication: Beware of Natural Justice
  • Recourse to Securities
  • Statutory Adjudication: Striving for National Security of Payment Legislation
  • Recent Developments in Expert Evidence
  • Dispute Boards

Copy and logo provided by Melbourne TEC Chambers. For more information on the seminars, an overview of the speakers and to secure yourself a seat at the seminars, please visit


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Briefing counsel: the myths
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...