find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
In-house legal team models 'evolving'

In-house legal team models 'evolving'

In-house team

A recent roundtable has confirmed reports that in-house legal team models are rapidly evolving and becoming more varied.

According to a Mahlab roundtable briefing, 'The view from the top', there are two distinct models being adopted by in-house legal teams, both of which hold benefits as corporate counsel continues to grow.

The briefing report noted that the two key models generally used to structure in-house legal teams are a “centralised model” and an “embedded model”.

It classified a centralised model as a legal team that is a separate functional unit, overseen by a general counsel.

Meanwhile, an embedded model is one in which lawyers are positioned within business units, reporting either directly or by dotted line to the general counsel. In the latter case, the lawyer may also report to the commercial manager who leads that business unit.

“The vast majority of the organisations represented at the roundtable discussions employed a centralised model. However, there have been some recent examples of prominent organisations moving towards an embedded model,” the briefing said.

“From a historical perspective, there is a recurring cycle whereby some organisations move between the models. This is perhaps because a tension often exists between the objectives of fostering engagement with stakeholders and maintaining professional distance.

“A hybrid structure is also employed in some organisations, especially those with larger legal teams.”

According to the briefing, a centralised models presents benefits including professional distance, management oversight and greater career development opportunities.

“A separate legal team is more likely to be objectively perceived as independent – an important factor for preserving legal professional privilege. Working with other lawyers also reinforces ethical obligations of independence,” the briefing said.

“Structural distance can also protect lawyers from being held captive by the business. For example, being called on to make hasty decisions in response to internal client deadlines.

“In some cases, though, it’s not so much a concern about lawyers losing sight of professional obligations, but that lawyers often prefer to work with other lawyers. There are natural benefits of information sharing, ongoing learning and camaraderie.”

On the other hand, “embedding lawyers in a business unit can be seen as a way to increase the lawyers’ commercial acumen and improve understanding of the commercial context”, the briefing said when highlighting the benefits of an embedded model.

“This embedding of lawyers can foster closer working relationships and create a trusted adviser status,” the briefing explained.

“This is particularly important for organisations that are working to facilitate greater and earlier consultation with the legal team.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

In-house legal team models 'evolving'
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Oct 19 2017
‘Ego status’ compelled ex-lawyer to defraud $2.97m, court told
Debarred lawyer John Gordon Bradfield told an NSW District Court that he was driven by “ego status...
Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA), Queensland’s new industrial manslaughter legislation,
Oct 19 2017
ALA welcomes ‘tough’ Qld manslaughter laws
The Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) has welcomed Queensland’s new industrial manslaughter legisl...
Legal podcasts, tune in, microphone
Oct 19 2017
Legal podcasts you have to tune in to right now
The rise of the internet has hailed in a new dawn for storytelling. Here’s our top pick of podcast...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...