find the latest legal job
Legal Advisor
Category: Other | Location: All Darwin NT
· Exciting and challenging environment · 3 year fixed contract - Position # LO6
View details
Property Lawyer | In-house | Global UK Company | 3-8PQE | Melbourne
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne VIC 3004
· Be part of a large in-house team · Property experience an advantage
View details
In-house Property Lawyer - 3-6year PQE | Dynamic High Impact Role
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne VIC 3004
· Highly regarded internal legal team · Ideal first in-house role
View details
Category: Other | Location: Perth CBD, Inner & Western Suburbs Perth WA
· Strategic Leadership Role · Strong Commercial Skills & Knowledge
View details
Category: Other | Location: Perth CBD, Inner & Western Suburbs Perth WA
· Statutory Appointment · Legal Profession Complaints Committee
View details
Former Chief Justice takes on Trump and the rule of law

Former Chief Justice takes on Trump and the rule of law

Donald Trump’s tweets about the credibility of courts from his POTUS Twitter account have been described by retired Chief Justice Robert French AC as a calculated undermining of a fundamental principle of justice.

US President Donald Trump’s recent flourishes on Twitter are a useful case study for rule of law proponents. At least, Former High Court Chief Justice Robert French AC (pictured) thought so, using his first public oration since retirement to lambast “calculated” attempts by the White House “to undermine respect for the rule of law”.

Speaking at a lecture hosted by the Victoria Law Foundation on Friday, the retired judge reflected on Mr Trump’s recent dispatches online. In particular, he noted how the language of the President’s tweet on 5 February pre-empted the court’s appeal process.

“The President's statement could not be dignified as 'criticism' of a judicial decision. It was rather a content-free coupling of epithets calculated to mitigate the political embarrassment caused by the ruling by suggesting that it and the 'so-called judge' somehow lacked legitimacy,” CJ French said.

“Such remarks may be seen as calculated to undermine respect for the rule of law."

President Trump took to Twitter to respond to a decision made by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. The court upheld a decision made by a Seattle-based judge to block a travel ban which the President had signed-off a few weeks prior.

“The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law enforcement away from our country is ridiculous and will be overruled,” Mr Trump Tweeted.

The President’s remarks preceded more recent statements from White House officials. An adviser to Mr Trump, Stephen Miller, later told Fox News Sunday that the Ninth Circuit Court decision was a “judicial usurping of power”.

“The President’s powers here are beyond question,” Mr Miller told the news program.

The executive order intended to put a ban on immigration for refugees and citizens of seven nations in the Middle East. With it, the Trump administration planned to put a 90-day ban on all would-be entrants from majority muslim countries Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a 120-day ban for refugees, and an indefinite ban on refugees from Syria.

In its emergency appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court, the Trump administration argued that the courts had no power to review the executive order. The court disagreed.  

CJ French went on to add, however, that the actions of the President and his government at least indicate an acceptance to the rule of law. This is demonstrated to the extent that the administration expressed its intention to appeal the Ninth Circuit Court decision, he said.

The 2017 Law Oration, which focused on respect for the rule of law, drew on a number of historical voices. Echoing the words of Cicero circa 63 BC, to American trial judge Chief Justice Roger Taney, who sat on the bench during the presidency of Abraham Lincoln in 1861, CJ French’s presentation even squeezed in a reference to '90s Star Trek spin-off series Deep Space Nine.

In his talk he traced the development of the rule of law principle, describing it as offering a “kind of societal infrastructure”. He suggested that now, more than ever, there is a need for wider public understanding about what this legal framework means.

“It has always been important that our community has an awareness of the essential elements of our legal system and our governmental institutions. It has never been more important than now,” CJ French said.

“The spaces left by lack of awareness and misunderstanding are all too readily filled by snake oil salesmen coming in from the hinterland of our civil and political discourses.”

CJ French’s full oration can be watched online.  

Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
May 26 2017
Coroner’s Lindt Café siege findings to have consequences for criminal lawyers
One of the most extensive coronial inquests in NSW has now concluded, with 45 recommendations concer...
May 26 2017
Lawyers can be humans too, judge says
Judge Felicity Hampel of the Victorian County Court has spoken about the need for lawyers to engage...
May 26 2017
Sydney to host international dispute resolution conference
A discussion focusing on the future of dispute resolution will come to Sydney on Monday, 29 May, as ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years...
Angela Lynch
May 9 2017
Women’s legal service appoints chief executive
Women’s Legal Service Queensland has appointed an experienced family lawyer as its new CEO. ...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...