find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
BigLaw 'rapidly' losing out to NewLaw counterparts

BigLaw 'rapidly' losing out to NewLaw counterparts

BigLaw NewLaw

Australian BigLaw firms need to rethink everything about the way they do business, with more competition coming from evolving NewLaw providers than ever before, according to Thomson Reuters. 

According to Thomson Reuters, traditional BigLaw firms are facing increased competition from the rapid emergence of NewLaw firms, forcing them to adapt the way they are structured and their take-up of disruptive technologies.

“The Australian legal market is seeing declining growth, revenues and employed lawyer numbers, so BigLaw providers need to rethink the way they are structured and their take-up of disruptive technologies. In other words, they need to rethink everything about the way they do business,” Thomson Reuters commercial director Carl Olson said.

“Commercially savvy clients are no longer willing to pay top dollar for low-level, repetitive work that could benefit from more cost-effective outsourcing arrangements, or greater automation in a law firm.

“Alternative fee structures therefore offer greater perceived certainty, value, benefits and efficiency than the traditional model of billing based on hours and volume of ‘manpower’.”

To combat the competition, Mr Olson said BigLaw firms need to place more of an emphasis on providing a flexible, client-focused service.

“In a more complex and globalised business environment with a geographically diverse workforce, sophisticated clients demand better value, more transparency and better service from their lawyers,” he said.

“The Australian legal market is client-centric. NewLaw firms stand out in their ability to let the client choose to pay for the services they think they need, rather than purchasing a lawyer’s full services over the course of a case.”

In addition, Mr Olson recommended BigLaw firms to up the ante when it comes to encouraging flexible working arrangements.

“BigLaw firms tend to be hierarchical, with a core number of partners supported by a larger cohort of solicitors and articled clerks, all charging clients at hourly rates,” Mr Olson said.

“A key differentiator of the NewLaw model matches a lean, low-overhead, highly-skilled team with the client’s specific requirements. This is made possible through remote-working technology, which lets NewLaw firms attract the best staff and offer them flexible working conditions.

“These firms don’t have to support a huge number of staff, nor do they need to maintain expensively impressive premises. Consequently, staff members gain work/life balance while clients receive a high level of service at a lower cost.”

Lastly, a greater focus on using new or “disruptive” technology is vital for BigLaw firms to succeed, according to Mr Olson.

“NewLaw providers seek to couple high-quality legal ability with innovative, client-focused delivery methods that use cutting-edge IT and process innovation,” he said.

“Investing in technology products to deliver greater intra-business or business-to-business connectivity, communication, practice management, cost reductions and process efficiencies are hallmarks of NewLaw providers.

“This can include anything from cloud-based systems, data analytics and workflow or task-oriented apps now to blockchain technology and artificial intelligence as time goes by.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

BigLaw 'rapidly' losing out to NewLaw counterparts
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...