find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Case a landmark for access to monopolies

Case a landmark for access to monopolies

AN AGREEMENT that concluded a five-year dispute between Virgin Blue and Sydney Airport Corporation has significant implications for access to essential services, according to a law firm acting…

AN AGREEMENT that concluded a five-year dispute between Virgin Blue and Sydney Airport Corporation has significant implications for access to essential services, according to a law firm acting in the matter.

In 2003, Sydney Airport changed the way it calculated its charges for take-off and landing rights from one based on maximum take-off weight to a per-passenger basis.

Virgin Blue said this change severely disadvantaged its business by increasing its take-off and landing fees by 53 per cent.

Gilbert & Tobin advised Virgin Blue throughout the dispute. Lead partner Luke Woodward said the fact that they managed to gain regulated access to Sydney Airport was extremely significant in itself.

“This matter was remarkable for a number of reasons,” said Woodward. “This was the first time that the Federal Court had considered the declaration criteria in Part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act, which could have considerable implications for the manner in which companies can obtain access to essential services in Australia.”

After Sydney Airport change to its fees, Virgin Blue applied to the Australian Competition Tribunal for regulated access to the facilities at Sydney Airport by “declaring” it under Part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act.

The tribunal granted this, deciding that the change in charging was a misuse of Sydney Airport’s monopoly power, and had a detrimental effect on competition between the airlines.

Sydney Airport appealed the decision to the full court of the Federal Court, but it upheld the Tribunal’s decision. A request to appeal to the High Court by Sydney Airport was refused.

Woodward said the test that had now been established in this decision should greatly simplify any further determinations on access to essential infrastructure that has monopoly ownership, and not require the years of highly detailed analysis that went into the effect of declaration on the airline industry in this case.

“If you can point to monopoly infrastructure, and that access to that infrastructure is essential to compete in an upstream or downstream market, you don’t have to go on to show how the determination of any subsequent dispute might materially assist competition,” Woodward explained.

“You just have to show that by using that infrastructure that will promote competition, and you will be able to compete in that market that you otherwise wouldn’t be able to, or compete more effectively, then you would satisfy that test.”

The agreement reached between Virgin and Sydney Airport provides for pricing to once again be based on maximum take-off weight as well as a new Virgin Blue lounge to be established within the existing Terminal 2 function centre.

Mallesons Stephen Jaques advised Sydney Airport Corporation, led by special counsel Thomas Jones and senior associate Andrew Floro.

Anna Sutherland and Donald Robertson at Freehills acted in ACCC arbitration for Sydney Airport in previous Federal Court and High Court proceedings related to this matter.

Paul Schoff at Minter Ellison advised Qantas, and Simon Uthmeyer at DLA Phillips Fox advised the National Competition Council.

Anna Pritchard at the Australian Government Solicitor advised the Parliamentary Secretary to the Commonwealth Treasurer.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Case a landmark for access to monopolies
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...