find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Pie Face lawsuit no piece of cake

Pie Face lawsuit no piece of cake

A franchising expert has claimed there is “considerable doubt” that Pie Face store owners seeking damages for financial losses were in fact misled over costs and profits by the franchisor.

Stephen Giles, a corporate and commercial partner at Norton Rose, told Lawyers Weekly that operational shortcomings, not misleading conduct by the franchisor, are probably behind the poor performance of three Pie Face businesses.

The Australian Financial Review reported last week (8 January) that lawyer Tom Bulmer was among three franchisees planning to sue Pie Face for collective losses totalling more than $2 million. The store owners claimed they were misled over costs and profits when they bought into the franchise. Prit Dutta, who owns a Pie Face franchise in Brisbane, told the newspaper: “After seven or eight months, when I looked at the figures, they were totally different to what Pie Face projected for us.”

Giles argued that severe penalties and an effective regulator are strong deterrents to breaching the Franchising Code of Conduct, which is enforceable under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. Franchisors can face penalties of up to $1.1 million per breach if they distort the potential income of a franchise, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

“It is most unusual for franchisors to make representations as to projected revenue or profit,” he said. “Most are well aware of the strength of the law and take great care in relation to what they say to prospective franchisees.”

Giles also clarified that opening a store in close proximity to an existing outlet is not illegal. He added that Pie Face had little to gain from such a move given the franchise holds the head lease for most of its stores.

“Commercially, no franchisor is going to want to open a store in close proximity to another store if that’s going to end up killing one of its businesses,” he said. “This is particularly the case if you’re taking the head lease because ... the franchisor will be left with that lease liability, which can cost a lot of money.”

Even so, franchisees have in the past successfully argued that a franchisor provided misleading profit forecasts. In April 2012, a franchisee of the restaurant chain Billy Baxter’s was awarded $1.3 million in damages after a Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal found the franchisor did not have reasonable grounds for its turnover estimates.

Fred Potgeiter, special counsel at Thomsons Lawyers, who is representing the disgruntled Pie Face franchisees, declined to comment on the potential lawsuit.

Pie Face has 80 stores in Australia and has recently expanded to New York.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Pie Face lawsuit no piece of cake
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...