find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
The Bramford case: What lawyers can learn

The Bramford case: What lawyers can learn

Lawyers can learn from the Bramford case, and help their accountants at the same time. Matthew Schlyder, the CEO at accountancy firm Elliotts, writes.

Lawyers can learn from the Bramfords case, and help their accountants at the same time. Matthew Schlyder, the CEO at accountancy firm Elliotts, writes.

As an accountant, I see many and varied trust deeds. Old, new, detailed, client tailored, standard precedent – the list goes on. No one trust deed is the same. 

Even deeds prepared by the same lawyers are different depending on the precedent used at the time of preparation.

Since the High Court handed down its verdict in the Bamford v Federal Commissioner of Taxation case, the variances in some deeds has caused concern. 

This case has surfaced several anomalies and the complexity of the case was made apparent when the two most uncertain and debated parts of income tax law were litigated by Bamford’s; income and share.

Bamford’s argued the meaning of these words in Section 97 of the Income Tax Assessment 1936. The Federal Court allowed the appeal so far as the income point was concerned, but rejected their definition of share.

The High Court in Bamford’s case confirmed that the term “income of the trust” as it appears in the opening words of section 97(1) derives its meaning from the general law of trusts (not from tax legislation). Accordingly, its meaning will be as defined in the trust deed. It was confirmed that if a beneficiary of a trust is presently entitled to a percentage of the income of that trust, then that beneficiary must include that percentage of the trust’s taxable income in that beneficiary’s own assessable income.

As a result of the decision in Bamford’s Case, we recommended that trust deeds are drafted with flexibility. This helps to define the trust income as being equal to section 95 net income excluding notional amounts such as imputation credits.

It also provides that the trustee has a discretion to adopt alternative concepts of income in any year; and it allows the trustee a discretion to make distributions from gross income before deducting expenses.

However, many existing trusts were established with trust deeds that were prepared a long time ago. These deeds should be updated where possible. It is important to carefully check the variation clause to ensure any changes are permitted and also to ensure that the power to make future changes is not unduly limited.

The first step is to ensure that your clients who have deeds (whether you prepared them or not), appropriately deal with the issues from Bamford’s. Make sure you don’t rely on accountants to make sure they are right.

Secondly, work with accountants to review all of your clients’ deeds. From my experience, it is much easier if all of your clients’ deeds are worded the same.

Thirdly, work closely with your client’s accountant to ensure they are properly preparing resolutions that align to their deed and are prepared within required time frames.

Finally, use the opportunity to review the clients’ deeds as a stepping stone to a full estate plan review.

Why are these opportunities for lawyers? 

Lawyers can use these opportunities to ensure their clients don’t receive any nasty surprises. In the Bamford’s case what the defendant thought was the case wasn’t in line with the High Courts’ views on the case.

Accountants are often a primary referral source for lawyers; this opportunity will help support and grow these relationships. Finally, this will allow you to generate additional services by proactively ensuring your clients affairs align to the current law and practice.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The Bramford case: What lawyers can learn
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...