find the latest legal job
Monash University Director Workplace Relations
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Exceptional senior leadership role
View details
Personal Injury Lawyer - Melbourne Eastern Suburbs - 2-5 years PAE
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Lilydale VIC 3140
· Fulfilling role as part of a small team in a positive workplace
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· In-house opportunity · Be part of our engine for success in a high growth business
View details
Trainer/Assessor Diploma of Legal Services
Category: Other | Location: Liverpool NSW 2170
· 3 Days Per Week · 9am - 4pm
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Adelaide CBD · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
Firm denied chance to defend itself in hacking case

Firm denied chance to defend itself in hacking case

Harbottle & Lewis, the London law firm engaged by News International during the phone hacking scandal of 2007, has asked - and been refused - permission by its former clients to waive client confidentiality on its role in the saga.

Harbottle & Lewis, the London law firm engaged by News International during the phone hacking scandal of 2007, has asked - and been refused - permission by its former clients to waive client confidentiality on its role in the saga. 


The firm issued a statement following evidence presented to a Parliamentary committee by News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch regarding alleged phone-hacking at the now-defunct tabloid News of the World. 


Harbottle & Lewis was working for the news organisation in 2007 during the internal investigation at News International into whether phone-hacking spread further than royal editor at the time, Clive Goodman. The firm advised that a cache of emails it reviewed did not show reasonable grounds for believing hacking went further than Goodman. 


Harbottle said in a statement that News International representatives referred to the advice in their statements on 19 July, before the Parliamentary select committee, both as a result of questioning and on their own account. 


"We asked News International to release us from our professional duties of confidentiality in order that we could respond to any inaccurate statements or contentions and to explain events in 2007. News International declined that request, and so we are still unable to respond in any detail as to our advice or the scope of our instructions in 2007, which is a matter of great regret."


Rupert Murdoch alleged In July this year that one of his group's lawyers made a "major mistake" in its role in the newspaper business' internal investigation into phone hacking. 


Murdoch made the comments in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. He cited a "major mistake" on Harbottle & Lewis' part in an investigation carried out four years ago into the scale of phone hacking at Murdoch's UK newspaper arm. 


Murdoch said the law firm had underestimated the scope of the phone hacking problem. 


Harbottle & Lewis's managing partner, Glen Atchinson, was unwilling to comment, and said "it is not our usual practice to comment on our clients' affairs or advice which we may or may not have provided". 


In a key exchange during the Parliamentary hearings, an MP asked Rupert Murdoch what mistake he was referring to in his comments. 


Murdoch replied: "I think maybe that's a question for James, but there was certainly - well, we examined it, re-examined that. We found things that we immediately went to counsel with to get advice on how to present it to the police."


James Murdoch referred to the advice received from the law firm in his Parliamentary testimony: "I am glad you have asked about it, actually, because it is a key bit of outside legal advice from senior counsel that was provided to the company, and the company rested on it. I think it goes some distance in explaining why it has taken a long time for new information to come out. It was one of the pillars of the environment around the place that led the company to believe that all of these things were a matter of the past and that new allegations could be denied."


There have been calls in the wake of the Parliamentary hearings for the law firm to be called to give evidence before a select committee. 


Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network