find the latest legal job
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Arncliffe NSW 2205
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
4+ PAE Commercial Lawyer - Contract Role (Maternity cover)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· 4+ years PAE · End-to-end deal carriage
View details
Partners and Senior Specialist Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Australia
· Earn 70% of billings and fixed referral incentives · Full practice flexibility & freedom
View details
Clients slam billable hour, again

Clients slam billable hour, again

CLIENTS ARE almost entirely united in seeing an end to the billable hour, with a majority of lawyers willing to agree, an anonymous survey has revealed.Conducted by Lawyers Weekly, the survey of…

CLIENTS ARE almost entirely united in seeing an end to the billable hour, with a majority of lawyers willing to agree, an anonymous survey has revealed.

Conducted by Lawyers Weekly, the survey of those in attendance at the recent Australian Legal Practice Management Association (ALPMA) conference showed that 95 per cent of clients believe a majority of clients want a change from the billable hour system. This was complemented by 71 per cent of lawyers who admitted most clients desired a change too.

Just under half of those attending the conference were aged between 46 and 60. The bulk of the audience were managers at law firms (69 per cent), with lawyers (12 per cent), external service providers (9 per cent) and law firm internal support (8 per cent) making up the rest.

When asked about the billable hour as a system of calculating fees, only 3 per cent believed it is extremely effective, 40 per cent somewhat effective, 26 somewhat ineffective and 13 extremely ineffective. The remaining 18 per cent did not have an opinion either way.

Legal services commissioner of New South Wales, Steve Mark, said cost is still the biggest area of complaint.

“The tyranny of the billable hour is quite extraordinary,” he said.

“The problem is that the legal profession has adopted the billable hour from the accountants. The accountants used it as a costing measure. We have used it as a charging measure. It is a very good costing measure. And that may be a very good aspect of your charging, but it shouldn’t be automatic in my view.”

Change is already on the cards according to Marks, with alterations being made to the Legal Profession Act, disclosure requirements and a cost panel review report currently being considered by the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG) and the NSW Government.

“Other things are being discussed such as fixed fee arrangements, and the issue of what we might call ‘flexible fixed fees’, where you might have negotiating points where the fixed fee is reviewed,” he said.

“And then there are issues of budgeting, which have been a recommendation of the cost panel review. That will be an interesting one because we have found practices, particularly through the process of incorporation, are becoming better managed.”

According to Marks, improved management alleviates budgeting problems and so “you are more likely to have systems that can help you achieve an appropriate budget for a matter”.

“If that is the case then that is better for everyone. It will get more certainty, more cash flow, the business model will be better, and the client will be happier,” he said.

Alternative billing remains an attractive alternative, according to the ALPMA survey. Of the entire audience, 71 per cent professed to using alternative billing methods, compared to 26 per cent who did not, and 3 per cent who were unsure.

Like this story? Read more:

Book commemorates diamond milestone for WA law society

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

Clients slam billable hour, again
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
06:04
Lawyer highlights ‘unintended consequences’ on SSM estate planning
A succession lawyer has warned that the right for same-sex couples to legally marry could have a sub...
drug rehabilitation services available in rural and remote communities
06:02
ALS survey shines spotlight on insufficient rehabilitation services
A new survey posted by the Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) has revealed an alarming insight into ...
Scales of Justice
Jan 17 2018
Lawyers lash out over latest Dutton attack
A number of legal bodies have condemned federal home affairs minister Peter Dutton’s latest commen...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...