find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
In-house grapple with efficiency lingo

In-house grapple with efficiency lingo

Some may call it semantics, but the issue of efficiency and its meaning has legal services experts' tongues wagging.

SOME may call it semantics, but the issue of efficiency and its meaning has legal services experts' tongues wagging. 

Ron Baker, the founder of legal services think tank VeraSage Institute, claims there is no point firms talking about efficiency for efficiency's sake. He compares efficiency to "effectiveness", and says firms should be striving for the latter. 

Efficiency focuses on doing things right, he said, while effectiveness  concentrates on doing the right things. 

While he concedes both are important, they can become mutually exclusive, he said. Baker said he can cite hundreds of cases where a decrease in measured efficiency still leads to an increase in effectiveness. 

However, he said on his blog recently, "I can't find many examples of where an increase in efficiency has increased effectiveness."

Efficiency, he said, is "always a ratio", expressed as the amount of output per unit of input. 

John Chisholm, director of law firm consultancy Chisholm Consulting, told The New Lawyer he agreed with Baker. 

Chisholm argues in-house counsel sometimes look at efficiency as a means to an end. He said what clients really want, despite some rhetoric to the contrary, is effectiveness. 

"There is a difference between efficiency for efficiency's sake and actually being efficient," he said. 

"Effectiveness is doing the right things, and more and more clients will expect their their lawyers to be effective and not necessarily efficient. In-house counsel want firms that are effective rather than efficient," he said. 

Chisholm argues that lawyers and legal commentators often forget that in-house lawyers are learning all the time how to value their law firms. 

Efficiency cannot be meaningfully defined without regards to your purpose, desires, and preferences, Baker advises law firm. 

"It cannot simply be reduced to output per man-hour. It is inextricably linked to what people want—and at what cost people are willing to pay."

Baker also throws another consideration into the mix. "Forget about efficiency. Worry about effectiveness. Better still, focus on efficaciousness; meaning having the power to produce a desired effect. This term is used to describe the miraculous power of many drugs since it suggests possession of a special quality or virtue that makes it possible to achieve a result—exactly what we are trying to accomplish in law firms for customers."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

In-house grapple with efficiency lingo
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...