find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Firm's bid to take client's money rejected

Firm's bid to take client's money rejected

The question of whether a law firm can hold a client’s money as a lien to cover legal fees is at the centre of an ongoing dispute.

 The question of whether a law firm can hold a client’s money as a lien to cover legal fees is at the centre of a dispute between a client and firm.

UK law firm Withers was this week denied the chance to appeal to the Supreme Court over whether it could hold its client’s money in case it was needed.

The appellate court ruled against the firm in December, finding that when determining whether client money held by a lawyer could be subject to a lien to cover legal fees, the issue was why the money was set aside. It had to be determined whether money was put aside for general purposes, or for a reason incompatible with a lien arising.

UK magazine The Lawyer reports the firm found itself caught up in a claim last year after it became involved in litigation between its client Ryback, and Langbar International. In this case, the client agreed to settle the claims against it for £30million. In a bid to safeguard the cash, the client paid the money tino the Withers client account.

The firm argued it should be allowed to set aside £410,000 of the client’s cash to cover fees incurred by the client during the course of its dispute with Langbar. 

As reported by The Lawyer, Langbar argued the money was owed to it as part of the settlement, and the Court of Appeal agreed with this fact late last year.

The Supreme Court has now rejected the firm’s request to take the case to the court because “the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time”.

Have your say below.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Firm's bid to take client's money rejected
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...