find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Firm's bid to take client's money rejected

Firm's bid to take client's money rejected

The question of whether a law firm can hold a client’s money as a lien to cover legal fees is at the centre of an ongoing dispute.

 The question of whether a law firm can hold a client’s money as a lien to cover legal fees is at the centre of a dispute between a client and firm.

UK law firm Withers was this week denied the chance to appeal to the Supreme Court over whether it could hold its client’s money in case it was needed.

The appellate court ruled against the firm in December, finding that when determining whether client money held by a lawyer could be subject to a lien to cover legal fees, the issue was why the money was set aside. It had to be determined whether money was put aside for general purposes, or for a reason incompatible with a lien arising.

UK magazine The Lawyer reports the firm found itself caught up in a claim last year after it became involved in litigation between its client Ryback, and Langbar International. In this case, the client agreed to settle the claims against it for £30million. In a bid to safeguard the cash, the client paid the money tino the Withers client account.

The firm argued it should be allowed to set aside £410,000 of the client’s cash to cover fees incurred by the client during the course of its dispute with Langbar. 

As reported by The Lawyer, Langbar argued the money was owed to it as part of the settlement, and the Court of Appeal agreed with this fact late last year.

The Supreme Court has now rejected the firm’s request to take the case to the court because “the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time”.

Have your say below.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Firm's bid to take client's money rejected
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Lawyers warn against mandatory sentencing measures amid political jeers
Mandatory sentencing has become a topic for politicians on both sides of Federal Parliament to jostl...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...