find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
The end of NZ barristerial immunity

The end of NZ barristerial immunity

THE NEW ZEALAND Supreme Court’s abolition of barristerial immunity for both civil and criminal proceedings has eradicated “an unjustifiable anachronism” according to Justice…

THE NEW ZEALAND Supreme Court’s abolition of barristerial immunity for both civil and criminal proceedings has eradicated “an unjustifiable anachronism” according to Justice Thomas.

The Court held last month that the absence of immunity will create “a more flexible legal system with a greater capacity to deliver justice in the individual case”.

Unanimous in their decision to dismiss the appeal in Chamberlains v Lai, the Court upheld the Court of Appeal judgment striking out the defence of immunity, but decided against leaving immunity for criminal proceedings for another day.

In the principal judgment delivered by the Court, it was held: “A distinction for the purposes of immunity between advocates conducting criminal proceedings and advocates conducting civil proceedings would be invidious for the reasons given in [Arthur J S Hall v Simons]. And the incongruity would be exacerbated by the difficulties of classification of proceedings as civil or criminal”.

The Court concluded that the reasons traditionally given for immunity are no longer justified.

“The former principal justifications for the immunity no longer persuade, if they ever did,” the judgment said.

It was also argued: “Although consistency with Australian law may have been a more important consideration if the matter had been evenly balanced, we consider that the answer as a matter of New Zealand law is clear-cut”.

The Court did not agree that any reconsideration of immunity should be left to Parliament. “The immunity was a creation of the common law. Its reception into New Zealand law did not alter its character.”

In response to the decision, Jim Farmer QC, president of the New Zealand Bar Association, said the Court’s judgments created more problems than they solved.

While the abolition of barristerial immunity now leaves barristers vulnerable to negligence claims, Farmer said, a claim brought against a barrister may end up being struck out by the court as an abuse of process, which will just amount to good money being thrown after bad. He did not think it was in the public interest that people should be encouraged to take cases that by their very nature were most unlikely to have realistic prospects of success.

However, Robert Gapes, Simpson Grierson partner and counsel for Hilda Lai, said the decision would help protect ordinary litigants against miscarriages of justice caused by their lawyer’s negligence.

“Those litigation lawyers who feel threatened can take some comfort from the experience in England where barristers immunity was abolished by the House of Lords in 2000,” Gapes said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The end of NZ barristerial immunity
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...