find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Law Council: no daylight for Hicks in US Bill

Law Council: no daylight for Hicks in US Bill

THE LAW Council of Australia has labelled United States’ new military commission proposal, delivered on the fifth anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, “rough justice”…

THE LAW Council of Australia has labelled United States’ new military commission proposal, delivered on the fifth anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, “rough justice” for Guantanamo Bay detainees.

The new Military Commission Bill, which US president George W Bush presented to Congress earlier in the month, provides for a commission system that still contravenes the rule of law, and cannot be expected to provide a fair trial to David Hicks, the Law Council said.

“The proposed new legislation is a political document, designed to appeal to populism in the lead-up to the mid-term elections in the United States,” Law Council president Tim Bugg said. “It contains nothing that would offer fresh hope of justice for [Hicks] and his family.”

The new Bill follows the US Supreme Court’s decision in Hamden v Rumsfeld in June that the existing system of military commission was unlawful and violated the Geneva Conventions.

Bush told Congress the Bill addressed the Hamden decision “by establishing for the first time in our nation’s history a comprehensive statutory structure for military commissions that would allow for the fair and effective prosecution of captured members of al-Qaeda and other unlawful enemy combatants”.

But according to Bugg, many of the “abhorrent aspects” of the commission process remain in the new Bill. “The proposed new system has no redeeming features whatsoever. It remains inherently unfair and contrary to the rule of law,” he said.

The legacy of the World Trade Centre attacks was ever-present in Bush’s address to Congress.

“Five years after the mass murders of 9/11, it is time for the United States to begin to prosecute captured al-Qaeda members for the serious crimes that many of them have committed against United States citizens and our allies abroad. As we provide terrorists the justice and due process that they denied their victims, we demonstrate that our nation remains committed to the rule of law,” the US president said.

Yet Bugg maintains that “those accused will still be pre-judged as terrorists who have no rights to a fair trial, and convicted persons can still be sentenced to death”.

Senior military lawyers have requested legislation based on the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the court martial system. Bugg believes the US’s excuses for not using such a system are “weak” and “clearly politically motivated”.

Bush said the commission system “tracks the courts martial procedures of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, but … departs from those procedures where they would be impracticable or inappropriate for the trial of unlawful enemy combatants captured in the midst of an ongoing armed conflict, under circumstances far different from those typically encountered by military prosecutors.”

Chief prosecutor, Air Force Col Morris Davis, expected that trials would resume in January 2007, although Bugg was sceptical this would happen.

“The Australian Government should rightly be disturbed by this Bill. Its passage would guarantee that [Hicks’] case will not be resolved in any way for several years. If that transpires, the Australian government should seek his immediate repatriation,” Bugg said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Law Council: no daylight for Hicks in US Bill
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...