find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Mid tier needs clearer identity

Mid tier needs clearer identity

MID-TIER FIRMS need to drop areas of practice that no longer give them a competitive edge in a market that is likely to see a “shake out” in coming months, according to commentators.…

MID-TIER FIRMS need to drop areas of practice that no longer give them a competitive edge in a market that is likely to see a “shake out” in coming months, according to commentators.

As branding becomes essential to the success of firms not in the mega-league, those mid-tier firms need to ensure that each of the practice areas they cover is appropriate to their long term strategy, Mike Watson, managing director at consultancy firm Flexion told Lawyers Weekly.

“[Firms in] the mid tier typically operate as a collection of practice [areas] — so they’ve had their tax practices and corporate practices and insurance practices. And they have run each of those practices to the beat of their own drum. This has meant it has been very difficult to develop a sense of brand,” he said.

Formerly a CEO of a mid-tier Australian firm, Watson said he has found many firms of this ilk are now facing problems in determining where to position themselves in the market.While some firms, such as Gilbert+Tobin, have been able to develop a recognisable brand, he said, others have “tended to be very operational in their thinking and they struggle to really get their head around the strategy side of how to move their business forward,” he said.

“It is quite confusing for both the clients and the recruitment market, who don’t know what the firms stand for. This is the difficulty that the mid tiers are finding — in trying to differentiate themselves in what is a reasonably crowded market for law firms in that mid tier.

“Strategy is as much about saying what you are not good at doing as what you are good at doing. As their practices have evolved, they find it very difficult to give up the areas of law that they no longer have a competitive advantage in,” Watson said.

“They are really struggling to get their partners together and have a sensible discussion about [this] and how they are going to invest in sustainable business for the future. They are finding that each of the little areas of business does not want to give ground. They each believe they are important and that there is some competitive advantage in what they do.”

There is little point merging with other firms and looking at consolidation activity, Watson argued. “This is a futile exercise because from a law firm’s point of view, scale for scale’s sake doesn’t add any cost benefit. There can be a bigger is better mentality: ‘If we expand or take on a small firm then the clients will be more attracted to us’. Some have gone through that exercise.” But these firms have found little benefit to their bottom line, he said.

“They need to know who they are and what they are good at doing. If that means expanding into a new territory to service their clients then they should do that — but only do it in a strategic way.”

To attract the new generation of lawyers, these large firms need to have a “compelling story” for the market about where they are going and what they want to be “famous for”, Watson said.

“I cannot overemphasise the power of the brand for legal firms as they head out into the marketplace. Generation X and Y are looking for an organisation that they can relate to, that has the overt behaviours and values that they identify with. It is very clear from a branding point of view that some of the mid tiers have that down pat and that some are struggling with it.”

Clients will also be lured by the firm’s self-definition, he suggested. There will not be “shake out” in the sense of merger activity and “people falling off the pack”, but from clients realigning their providers, based on their changing strategic needs, said Watson.

“[Clients] are looking for deep industry knowledge and a lot of commercial empathy — firms that can demonstrate they understand their business and can look at it as a whole business rather than an individual legal issue they are dealing with,” he said.

Deborah Zurnamer, senior consultant at legal recruiter BSI People, also identified a “shake-up” in the market. She said a shortage of good quality talent and the movement of senior practitioners within both the top and mid tier means firms have to stand out from their competitors.

Zurnamer said that in this competitive marketplace, in which every firm is looking for the top quality candidates, “mid-tier firms need to establish a real point of difference”.

“I think that it’s crucial in terms of a marketing edge for them. I think [mid-tier firms] must be clear about what they are trying to achieve — what differentiates them from other firms. There has to be an energy force around the firm that is being driven by management. This really affects market perception in regards to specialty candidates who will then be drawn to a firm that has that edge about it, or the buzz about it,” she said.

Consultant Sue-Ella Prodonovich told Lawyers Weekly late last year that some firms have attracted key practitioners to some key areas. “Certain firms, including Gilbert+Tobin, Henry Davis York and Arnold Bloch Leibler, are top tier in the areas in which they choose to practise.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Mid tier needs clearer identity
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...