find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Response to MH17 shows treaty process not broken

Response to MH17 shows treaty process not broken

John Reid

The swift construction of a legal framework to fast track the investigation of last year’s Malaysia Airlines crash is a rare example of bureaucracy and treaty law working well together, a top government lawyer has said.

“Although the [process] is usually regarded … as overly-bureaucratic, MH17 shows that treaty law, at least last year, made its mark and allowed governments to solve some pretty hairy problems, legally creating flexibility fairly swiftly,” John Reid (pictured) told the International Law Conference at the University of Sydney on February 6.

Mr Reid is first assistant secretary at the International Law and Human Rights Division and assistant secretary at the Office of International Law in the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department.

He pointed to Australia’s free trade agreements with South Korea and China as examples of how negotiations between nations can be drawn out over almost a decade.

Many believe that “bureaucracy plus treaty law means nothing will ever happen ever”, said Mr Reid.

However, the Malaysia Airlines crash raised numerous tricky international law problems, which were all resolved relatively quickly given the circumstances.

“The legal framework surrounding MH17 … isn’t just one treaty, it’s a whole raft of them — seven or eight instruments at last count.

“I think [MH17] shows the way that countries can use treaty law to overcome hurdles and to solve problems,” he said.

On July 18 last year, the flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur went down in eastern Ukraine, killing 298 people in total, including 38 Australian citizens and permanent residents.

The Dutch investigation has supported suspicions that the aircraft was brought down by high-speed objects, believed to be surface-to-air missiles launched by militants on the ground. The aircraft was following an uncontroversial flight path and was above temporary restricted airspace.

Mr Reid said the Australian prime minister was advised immediately following the crash and at 8am the next morning there was a meeting of senior officials in Canberra

“The lawyers in the room begin to think about what the problems were that needed to be solved," he said.

“First of all, the bodies needed to be retrieved… The second thing was that there needed to be an air crash investigation into what happened and the third thing, which didn’t crystallise for a little while, was that there had to be a criminal investigation,” he said.

A further complication was that the plane had crashed in what was effectively a war zone and there were very serious doubts about the safety and security of anyone, Ukrainian or otherwise, going into the area.

“So that was on 18th July. On 19th July things start happening around the world... The first significant movement is, quite appropriately, [within] the UN,” said Mr Reid.

Within four days of the crash, the UN passed Resolution 2166, which recognised the need to provide access and security measures for investigators in Ukraine.

“At that point, there are at least five or six legal issues that needed to be resolved: How do we get access to the crash site? Who is going to get access? How are they going to be safe and secure? Who is going to be responsible for various investigations?”

There was also the issue of who was to be in charge, since a number of countries were keen to lead the investigations, said Mr Reid.

Five days after the event, Ukraine delegated responsibility for the investigation to the Netherlands by way of a memorandum of understanding (MOU).

Australia simultaneously proposed an MOU agreement to grant immunity to Australian armed personnel deployed in Ukraine.

However, this agreement was not passed through Ukraine’s parliament until August 11 because “Ukraine helpfully had another coup” in which the standing prime minister was temporarily ousted.

“A really interesting curve ball was thrown late in the piece, which needed a bit of a creative solution,” said Mr Reid.

Australian personnel travelling through the Netherlands carrying weapons also needed authorisation, which required a whole separate negotiation.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Response to MH17 shows treaty process not broken
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
microphone
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
protest
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...