find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Fair Work Commission in ‘legal arms race’

Fair Work Commission in ‘legal arms race’

A major union has praised the Fair Work Commission for excluding legal representatives from a recent hearing, warning lawyers were becoming too dominant in FWC matters.

Under current legislation, parties wishing to be represented by a lawyer at FWC hearings must seek leave from the bench.

In the recent matter of Asciano Services v Hadfield, the Commission rejected an employer’s petition for representation then upheld the decision on appeal.

Rail, Tram and Bus Union national secretary Bob Nanva welcomed the outcome, saying the Commission was originally designed to be an informal dispute resolution forum.

“The Commission has now sent a clear message to major employers that they must hire staff qualified to handle simple matters and can no longer rely on big law firms to run all of their disputes, including unfair dismissals,” Mr Nanva said.

According to Mr Nanva, there is a growing trend for employers to hire top-flight legal teams, disadvantaging employees with fewer resources.

“This has created a legal arms race, where everyone has to ‘lawyer up’ in order to maintain fairness in Commission proceedings,” he said.

“We believe there will always be a place for lawyers to assist in complex matters and to ensure parties in Commission proceedings are given all due advice and assistance, but Fair Work Commission proceedings should not become a lawyers’ picnic.”

Profession fights back

Employment lawyer and managing principal of People + Culture Strategies Joydeep Hor (pictured below) disputed that lawyers should be ousted from hearings.

While Mr Hor agreed the Commission should be less legalistic than courts, he said the laws governing workplace issues were becoming increasingly complex.

“The person that is making the decision is required to be au fait with the law and applies the law,” he said. “It's odd that you've got a situation ... where the decision-maker is fully informed about the law, but the parties are not entitled to have their lawyers present.”

While he acknowledged employers may have an advantage by hiring expert representation, he said such power imbalances were common in most courtrooms.

“There always may be inequality in bargaining power, access to resources, willingness to engage lawyers. But you don't get the courts deciding …we're not going to allow anyone to be represented by lawyers.”

Mr Hor suggested in many circumstances, employment lawyers were able to assist the Commission in performing its duties.

“We talk about lawyers being officers of the court and I think that's an important part of the function of lawyers in the industrial relations jurisdiction.”

He also pointed to newly introduced, untested areas of legislation – such as the bullying regime – where the Commission had indicated a willingness to allow representation in all cases.

“As long as everyone is given a chance to be represented legally, it just doesn't seem to make sense to require lawyers to have to justify why they should be given that prerogative,” Mr Hor said.

The NSW Bar Association sought leave to intervene in the Asciano matter, but was rejected by the Commission.

“The submissions the Bar Association intended to advance did no more than agitate for an outcome based on the particular facts of the case and in that respect essentially did no more than echo the case of the Appellant,” FWC vice president Hatcher wrote in his decision.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Fair Work Commission in ‘legal arms race’
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...