find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Proposed citizenship laws overturn 800 years of precedent

Proposed citizenship laws overturn 800 years of precedent

magna carta

Ministerial stripping of Australian citizenship from terrorist suspects with dual nationality goes against the “mythic force” of Magna Carta, Bret Walker SC has said.

“There has been unfortunately too long a delay in the government making clear that they have no intention, surely, of departing from the model, which is already in Magna Carta and in the Australian Citizenship Act, whereby judicial power will determine whether something as terrible as stripping of citizenship will follow by way of punishment,” he said in an address at the University of Sydney on 4 June.

Mr Walker, who is the former independent national security legislation monitor, spoke at an event celebrating 800-year anniversary of Magna Carta.  

The Magna Carta is a charter enacted by King John of England on 15 June 1215, which states that a person may not be imprisoned, punished or prevented from returning home except by “the lawful judgement of his peers or the laws of the land”.

“You will not find there any reference to ministerial discretion,” said Mr Walker, wryly.

He said the principles laid out in the Magna Carta are important because they “command … assent of people otherwise of divergent political views”.

“They are things which … will gain well-nigh universal approval. That is that you would have to market yourself as an authoritarian tyrant … in order to dissent from it.”

Mr Walker is unconvinced by the argument that terrorism offences abroad are “very difficult to prove” and should therefore be decided by a minister.

“I’ve never yet heard – and Magna Carta surely sets [us] against the notion – that an offence difficult to prove is an offence you don’t have to prove.

“And [that] an offence that you cannot persuade 12 people unanimously [of] … is one you don’t have to persuade anybody of … except the minister on the basis of secret intelligence, which will not be tested or even seen by the person against who it is being recorded.

“Who cares less of what a minister, any more than what a bus driver, says [about whether someone is guilty of terrorism]?” he retorted.

He said that there are precedents for revoking citizenship, such as when a serious offence is committed in the period between applying and gaining citizenship or when an Australian citizen serves in the armed forces of another country. However, these have all traditionally been decided by the courts with ministerial discretion being used to mitigate punishment rather than inflict it.

Mr Walker described the push for new anti-terror laws as “the latest iteration of Australia’s obsession with being the country with a [category] of its own in the Guinness Book of World Records [for having] the most counter-terrorism laws in the world already”.

“There is something deeply affecting and in a sense sentimentally touching about the Australian faith that if you legislate things will be better,” he said.

“I have no idea how a boatload of convicts thought that the combination of legislating and the population’s addiction to law abiding would produce a happier place.

“We actually think passing laws will affect things on the ground. I don’t believe that. I tried in every one of my reports to suggest that the laws that really mattered to counterterrorism were those that funded surveillance ... police and prosecution.”

Mr Walker's comments mirror criticisms made by president of the Human Rights Commission Gillian Triggs and human rights commissioner Tim Wilson.

Mr Dutton has sent conflicting messages about whether ministerial powers will be subject to judicial review under the proposed laws. He has previously said, “The government’s not going to have the courts second-guessing ministerial decisions”.

This week he changed tack, saying the government “believe[s] very strongly in having judicial oversight” but that there needs to be a “common-sense application of the law based on all the facts available to the minister”.

There has also been confusion over whether the planned legislation could render people stateless, thus violating international law.

Dr Emily Crawford from Sydney Law School, who also spoke at the event, said that the proposed laws will affect those “eligible to apply for citizenship of another country, even if they don’t actually hold that foreign citizenship”.

“This could ensnare scores of people whose parents or even grandparents were born overseas, even if they themselves are second or third generation Australian born,” she said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Proposed citizenship laws overturn 800 years of precedent
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
microphone
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
protest
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...