find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
Firm opposes Harper Review reform to ‘misuse of market power’

Firm opposes Harper Review reform to ‘misuse of market power’


Boutique firm Arnold Bloch Leibler has argued against proposed changes to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 in a submission to the Treasury.

On the back of the Harper Review into competition policy's release last year, the Treasury has invited submissions on the proposed amendments.

Among the recommendations were changes to section 46 of the act, which prohibits the misuse of market power.

The Harper Review recommended removing the “take advantage” test, inserting a “purpose, effect or likely effect” test and shifting focus from “damage to a competitor” to “substantially lessening competition”.

The review also proposed introducing a number of mandatory factors for the court to take into account and “additional measures to reduce uncertainty”.

In a submission on behalf of ABL, partners Zaven Mardirossian and Matthew Lees urged the government to reject the proposed amendments, citing a “lack of evidence of a need to change”.

“It remains unclear what conduct the changes are trying to capture that is not already captured by the current law,” they said.

“It is remarkable that the Discussion Paper proposes six options but does not define the problem those options are seeking to address. This prevents any serious cost-benefit analysis of those options, and means the debate must be conducted at the level of general principles around the drafting of competition laws.”

In Mr Mardirossian’s and Mr Lees’ view, the current law sets out clear parameters for businesses to follow to avoid falling foul of competition rules.

By contrast, the proposed legislation would potentially open “each and every aspect of a business’s unilateral conduct” open to scrutiny by the ACCC, competitors or other commercial players.

“As lawyers, we see clearly the potential for the proposed s 46 to facilitate unmeritorious claims that are designed to hinder, not protect, competitive conduct,” they wrote.

“It would be all too easy to allege that any vigorous competitive conduct that adversely affects competitors would be ‘likely’ to have the effect of substantial lessening competition at some stage in the future.”

Given the “inherent uncertainty” of the test, businesses may find it safer and easier to avoid aggressive competitive strategies, damaging the strength of the market overall, they warned.

“The Harper Review itself acknowledged that the proposed s 46 risked prohibiting legitimate competitive conduct that should not be prohibited.

“It might seem desirable, in theory, to prohibit all conduct that has an anti-competitive purpose, effect or likely effect but this would, in reality, increase uncertainty for businesses, facilitate unmeritorious claims and inhibit legitimate competitive conduct.

"Ultimately, this would be bad for competition and consumers.”

Do you know an outstanding competition lawyer? Submit a nomination for the Lawyers Weekly Partner of the Year Awards.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Firm opposes Harper Review reform to ‘misuse of market power’
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Law Council of Australia
Nov 21 2017
LCA calls for urgent adoption of ‘game-changing’ recommendation
The Law Council of Australia has urged for the immediate adoption of a key recommendation put forwar...
Sally Wheeler
Nov 20 2017
ANU College of Law appoints new dean
A distinguished legal academic and the former head of law of a higher education institution in Irela...
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...