find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Takeover law reform required

Takeover law reform required

Rodd Levy, Herbert Smith Freehills

Two global firm partners have called for reforms to Australia’s takeover law to reduce red tape, simplify the rules and drive greater efficiency for the benefit of the economy.

Two Herbert Smith Freehills M&A partners, Rodd Levy (pictured left) and Baden Furphy (pictured right), have called for reforms to Australia’s takeover law, with four key proposals.

"Despite takeovers being regarded as an integral part of the operation of equity markets and of the Australian economy, there has been no general review of the principles underlying our takeovers laws for many decades," Mr Levy, who is also a member of the Australian Takeovers Panel, said.

"In this respect, Australia lags behind many overseas countries which have revised their rules from time to time as their markets have developed."

According to Mr Furphy, current elements of the regulatory framework are overly complex and in some cases unnecessary.

"Our suggested reforms are intended to reflect the current principles in legislation of providing fairness for shareholders, and to promote greater takeover activity for the benefit of the Australian economy," he said.

The first proposal is that a person who controls more than 50 per cent of the shares in a company should be free to acquire further shares without having to make a bid or satisfy another exemption.

Mr Levy and Mr Furphy believe that the law should focus only on transactions resulting in a change of control, and that regulating acquisitions by a person already in control just introduces red tape and unnecessary cost.

The second proposal is that all bids should be subject to a mandatory 50 per cent minimum acceptance condition so control of the target company only passes at a price acceptable to the majority of shareholders.

According to Mr Levy and Mr Furphy, this would bring our laws into line with the rules in many other jurisdictions and would ensure that effective control could not pass quickly unless the bid was strongly supported.

Thirdly, they proposed that where a bid has been recommended by target directors, the bidder should be able to compulsorily acquire all the shares in the company if it achieves acceptances for 75 per cent of outstanding shares.

Mr Levy and Mr Furphy consider that the dual test of target director support and 75 per cent acceptance provides sufficient protection. Lowering the threshold from 90 per cent to 75 per cent would bring the rule more into line with the rule applying in scheme of arrangement, reductions of capital and alterations to company constitutions.

Lastly, they proposed that a bidder should be free to obtain commitments to accept the bid from shareholders with more than 20 per cent of the shares on issue, subject to the commitment lapsing if a higher bid is made.

Mr Levy and Mr Furphy said this is the ordinary effect of our rules now with bidders frequently securing public commitments under the 'truth in takeover' rule anyway. Introducing a specific rule would at least clarify the legal position.


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Takeover law reform required
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...