find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Insolvency reform ignites debate among lawyers

Insolvency reform ignites debate among lawyers

Farrid Assaf

A number of lawyers have called for reform to the insolvency regime in Australia, but the most desirable model has divided opinion.

The Australian insolvency regime has come under close government scrutiny in recent years, with the Productivity Commission delivering its Business Set, Transfer and Closure report in December 2015 and then the commonwealth government calling for submissions to it ‘Improving bankruptcy and insolvency laws’ proposals paper in April.

Barrister Farid Assaf – who recently became a fellow of the International Association of Restructuring, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Professionals – told Lawyers Weekly that the Australian system was in dire need of reform.

He urged for the adoption of a "restructuring culture" modelled on the US, where the statutory regime encourages insolvent companies to restructure rather than liquidate.

"The worst-case scenario for most companies is liquidation," he said.

"What [the Productivity Commission] report was basically saying is we actually don't have a restructuring culture here. There is a rescue attempt at restructuring informally but it's not really supported by the legislation."

Under the US regime, which is commonly known as by its statutory designation Chapter 11, company directors are able to present a restructuring plan for approval to the courts.

"Ultimately, the aim is to allow the company to continue in existence and avoid insolvency," he said. "It's extremely complicated, detailed and sophisticated – but it works."

Under this system, he suggested lawyers would have a more active role in business strategising and restructuring.

"The restructuring regime is very lawyer-intensive," he said.

"As lawyers, we can add value to businesses and the community by helping businesses and insolvency practitioners navigate through the myriad legislation. That's our value-add, to make sure our clients are acting in accordance with the law but also to make sure they're acting as efficiently as possible."

Proposals under scrutiny

Two of the most controversial suggestions contained in the proposals paper appear to be recommendations for the introduction of a 'safe harbour' for directors and voiding 'ipso facto' clauses in contracts.

The paper proposes two separate models of 'safe harbour', which would grant the director of an insolvent company protection from prosecution for insolvent trading: Model A, where a professional restructuring adviser with no liability is appointed and Model B, where the prohibition on insolvent trading in the Corporations Act is modified.

In Mr Assif’s view, both models are flawed. He believes Model A is likely to create a 'safe harbour' for larger companies, while making it "effectively inaccessible to the directors of SMEs".

While Model B is preferable, he listed a number of concerns regarding the language used in its formulation.

Meanwhile, in a submission to the Commonwealth government, global firm King & Wood Mallesons suggested neither model provided "sufficient certainty or protection" to Australian directors.

Rather, the firm urged for amendment to the existing prohibition on insolvent trading to create a defence of "reasonable expectation".

MinterEllison, on the other hand, argued that the models were a good start but needed additional work to promote the interests of creditors.

"One option to address this could be to give new and future creditors a priority status in any subsequent liquidation as a quid pro quo for participating in the restructuring," partner Michael Hughes said. 

"Another option is to consider the specific actions of directors towards those creditors in determining whether a safe harbour to insolvent trading liability is available."

The proposal to void 'ipso facto' clauses, which allow creditors to withdraw from a contract if an "insolvency event" occurs, also stirred up debate.

Mr Assaf threw his support behind the proposition as a "long overdue reform", arguing that the circumstances where such clauses are void should be expanded.

However, MinterEllison was more cautious, urging for ipso facto clauses not be made void but have their operation suspended instead.

King & Wood Mallesons warned the reform would be a "significant expansion for the breadth of the (already broad) receivership and controller rights" under Australian law and urged for further consultation with affected interests before any change is made.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Insolvency reform ignites debate among lawyers
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...