find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Lip service limiting flexible work

Lip service limiting flexible work

A positive work culture offers few gains for lawyers if these priorities are not communicated to clients, and to partners who are prepared to lead by example, the director of the Workplace Gender Equality Agency has said.

According to Libby Lyons (pictured), crafting a law firm culture is an important and generally well-meaning undertaking. While the process often leads to the implementation of good policies and initiatives, the Workplace Gender Equality Agency director believes a more pervasive reality is at play, which ultimately drives many talented lawyers to quit.

Speaking at a lunch talk hosted by the Women Lawyers Association of NSW last week, she offered an honest assessment of the natural resistance to flexible work arrangements that firms face.

“We live in an interconnected world and, increasingly, clients expect us to be on call at all hours for a reduced cost. In the law, these factors are worsened by the expectation that lawyers are also personally responsible for developing a wide client base,” Ms Lyons said.

“I fear that many law firms and lawyers simply don’t see utilising [flexible work] policies as compatible with building a client network and developing a practice.”

Junior and mid-level lawyers, those who would benefit from flexible workplace arrangements the most, often feel that flexible work will hinder their ability to develop and manage their client base, Ms Lyons said. The result is that career-minded individuals rarely entertain the idea of flexible work arrangements.

She offered a comparison between the experience of women and men in seeking flexible work, as well as the difference in the way junior and senior lawyers perceive entitlement to alternative work arrangements.

“Many young lawyers who we’ve spoken to at the agency believe their ability to develop new clients and hang on to their current clients will disappear if they start working flexibly.

“These pressures only increase as lawyers move into their senior associate positions in their early 30s, which of course increases the stress level,” Ms Lyons said.

“I recently spoke to a very successful young male associate, and although he liked his firm and he felt it had a good corporate culture, and he knew men at that firm that worked flexibly, he didn’t feel as though it was an option available to him. When we asked why, he said his partner was ‘old school’ and probably would not support his request,” she said.

Ms Lyons suggested that the reason why there are many miserable, work-obsessed lawyers boils down to several key factors.

The greatest challenge facing firms, as in all professional services industries, is overcoming social norms about what an effective employee looks like. Companies across the board must consider turning emphasis away from the hours an employee clocks to the outcomes they deliver, she said.

“While many law firms may have excellent policies when it comes to flexibility, they need to ensure that they are giving their employees real permission to use them. And that the work that they’re giving them is commensurate with their skills and experience – not the number of days they’re sitting at their desk.”

Libby Lyons speaking at the Women Lawyers Association of NSW corporate lunch series. The event was supported by Bartier Perry and the Law Society of NSW. 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lip service limiting flexible work
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...