find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Legal body rejects proposed overhaul of Racial Discrimination Act

Legal body rejects proposed overhaul of Racial Discrimination Act

reject

Australian Lawyers for Human Rights has hit back at conservative calls for a parliamentary inquiry aimed to “scale back” a section of the Racial Discrimination Act.

According to ALHR, moves to alter section 18C due to the belief that it is an unacceptable limitation on free speech will be unpopular with the majority of Australians, and also inconsistent with international human rights law.

“Those calling for an inquiry do not seem to understand that the legislation is not about a person subjectively taking offence, but about whether the speech was objectively offensive and insulting – the kind of hate speech that encourages racism,” said Dr Tamsin Clarke of ALHR.

“Nor do they seem to understand that to be caught by the legislation, the speech must relate not to the victim’s actions but to their apparent identity, and must fall outside the many extensive exceptions in section 18D.

“Indeed, those who decry section 18C as an unacceptable limitation on free speech appear to consistently and conveniently ignore the existence of section 18D, which clearly establishes that where something is said or done in good faith for genuine academic or scientific purpose or in the public interest it will not fall foul of section 18C, nor will any material published in a fair and accurate report on a matter of public interest.”

Dr Clarke noted that in the absence of a Commonwealth bill of rights, laws that prohibit hate speech seek to discourage racism by setting a standard of respectful speech and behaviour.

“Again and again over the 40 years since it was first enacted, the wider Australian community has supported the Racial Discrimination Act,” she said.

“One can only conclude that those politicians who, despite overwhelming public support for the legislation, seek to roll it back, want themselves and others to be free to engage in racist hate speech.

“If we are to remove legislative restrictions on insulting and offensive behaviour in Australia, a lot more than the Racial Discrimination Act will have to change, but is that really what we want? That we should feel free to slander and attack people on the grounds of their racial identity, not their actions?”

In conclusion, Dr Clarke said the call for an inquiry just “proves how badly Australia needs a bill of rights to protect all Australians’ human rights, and in particular a person’s right to be treated with dignity and live a life free from intimidation and harassment on the grounds of race”.

“[This is] a concept widely protected by law throughout the rest of the world, but apparently alien to our politicians,” she added.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Legal body rejects proposed overhaul of Racial Discrimination Act
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Aug 16 2017
Urgent criminal law reforms can prevent ‘unwarranted acquittals’
Concerns about unfair prejudice arising from the use of tendency and coincidence evidence are mispla...
Aug 15 2017
Press Control-S on your firm
Promoted by BHL Software It’s now a truism that when your IT systems stop working, so does you...
Aug 15 2017
The Importance of Leadership Skills for Aspiring Lawyers
Promoted by LHD Lawyers Even the most prominent lawyers of our age (or ages past, for that matter...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...