find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
WA tribunal prevents abuse of process by Complaints Committee

WA tribunal prevents abuse of process by Complaints Committee

Lloyd Rayney has successfully shown that attempts to cancel his practising certificate in WA may have resulted in an abuse of process.

Western Australia’s State Administrative Tribunal has made an order dismissing a second bid to cancel barrister Lloyd Rayney’s practising certificate.

Mr Rayney’s career in law had been challenged by the WA Legal Profession Complaints Committee (LPCC) and Legal Practice Board (board) respectively in two separate applications to cancel his practising certificate, and which were both contested by the barrister in 2015.

In 2012, the Perth man was acquitted after being put on trial for the murder of his estranged wife Corryn Rayney, who worked as a registrar in the Supreme Court of Western Australia.

Ms Rayney’s buried body had been discovered in Kings Park in 2007, with the respected barrister later targeted as the prime suspect for her death.

Mr Rayney is currently pursuing a multimillion-dollar defamation case against the state for police comments suggesting he was the prime suspect for the crime. Those proceedings are listed for trial later this year.

Last month, the tribunal found that two separate proceedings to have Mr Rayney’s practising certificate cancelled relied on “substantially identical” facts. The tribunal ruled that this meant the LPCC application amounted to an abuse of process as per section 47(1)(c) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004.

In determining whether there had been an abuse of process, the tribunal considered the substance of the matter, not form of the action taken against Mr Rayney.

Citing authorities about the nature of this type of determination, it added that the party alleging an abuse of process shouldered a “heavy” onus to satisfy the court that an abuse of process existed. Furthermore, the tribunal said that a finding as to motive was unnecessary for the purpose of determining abuse of process.

“Abuse of process is inherently broader and more flexible than estoppel and is capable of application in any circumstances in which the use of a court’s or tribunal’s procedures would be unjustifiable and oppressive to a party or would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.”

“It is clear […] that a failure to have proceedings heard in tandem may constitute an abuse of process,” the decision read.

The tribunal also dismissed submissions made by the LPCC claiming that its own investigative powers, which the board lacked, was “of significance” in its choice to take steps to cancel Mr Rayney’s pracitising certificate.

However, the tribunal did acknowledge the close working relationship between the two groups, and said there was “nothing inappropriate” with the sharing of information about Mr Rayney's matter between the LPCC and the board.

“The tribunal does not accept that there was any unfairness to Mr Rayney in the exchange of the information because that exchange is part of the board’s and the LPCC’s statutory functions as parts of the same regulatory framework,” the tribunal said.  

In mid-2015 Mr Rayney gave notice to the LPCC of his intention to resume practice. Several written exchanges then passed between the barrister and LPCC.

The LPCC then requested that Mr Rayney provide copies of his trial transcript, copies of the indictment, prosecution brief, witness statements and exhibits concerning telecommunications charges, which were in part related to the investigations surrounding death of Ms Rayney.

By early June, the LPCC renewed its request for materials related to Mr Rayney’s telecommunications charges trial and, on the same day, also issued a notice inviting the barrister to make written submissions with respect to the proposed cancellation of his practising certificate.

On 16 July, My Rayney provided the LPCC with most of the documents requested. The following day he received a notification that the LPCC had cancelled his practising certificate.  

In its order dismissing the LPCC’s decision to cancel Mr Rayney’s pracising certificate, the tribunal underscored the importance of allegations being dealt with as a whole.

“It is a fundamental principle of justice that allegations with a common factual basis should be dealt with together. A person should not have to face multiple suits brought by the same entity,” the tribunal said.

“The LPCC […] concedes that it is possible that the referral and the review application might have been heard together. The fact that the tribunal in its review jurisdiction and in its original jurisdiction might have been drawing different legal conclusions about the same conduct is not excuse for the failure to have matters heard together.

“The board proceedings and the LPCC proceedings should have been heard together, given the closeness of the factual allegations made against Mr Rayney in the s 421 Notice and the s 56(2) Notice,” the decision read.


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

WA tribunal prevents abuse of process by Complaints Committee
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Jackie Rhodes
Dec 12 2017
Report sheds light on LGBTQI inclusion in law firms
A recent report has revealed the varying perceptions on LGBTQI diversity and inclusion in the Austra...
Women in business
Dec 12 2017
Annabel Crabb headlines Women in Business Forum
Political journalist Annabel Crabb has appeared at the Coleman Greig Lawyers Women in Business Forum...
Dec 11 2017
Warm welcome for new district court judges
Three practitioners who were appointed as district court judges in WA have been congratulated by ...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...