find the latest legal job
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Great Career Opportunity ·
View details
Insurance and Health Lawyer (1-4 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· New position to support Growth ·
View details
Court rebukes ‘waste’ of lawyers piled on bankruptcy matter

Court rebukes ‘waste’ of lawyers piled on bankruptcy matter

A judge has lamented the unnecessary "general model" of putting many more lawyers on a case than needed and duplicating work which barristers could do at a more reasonable expense to the client.

An insolvency matter before the federal court has attracted strong rebuke from Justice Steven Rares, who described the legal fees of the case as wasteful.

Four lawyers from Piper Alderman were assigned to work on the case for the client, a bankruptcy trustee, plus counsel.

The client, Samuel Piscopo, went to court in March seeking security of costs from the bankrupt estates of a NSW couple.

The judge said that legal fees the application incurred on account of five practitioners involved in the work, that in some instances were a duplication of efforts, “bespeaks a failure to address a client’s best interests”.

Referring to the quantification of the security of costs the applicant had filed, Justice Rares noted that the total estimate pf $239, 485 appeared “very large”.

The judge went on to observe the significant tally of Piper Alderman solicitors – four – to have worked on the matter at rates much greater than the rates of counsel.

“[The estimates were based] on differing hourly rates for work performed by a partner ($605 per hour), a senior associate ($490 per hour), an associate ($420 per hour) and a lawyer ($310 per hour). Counsel briefed in the matter was charging $3,200 per day and $400 per hour,” Justice Rares said.

Justice Rares added that the last step of preparations included nearly $17,000 for work by the solicitors for the estimated two-day hearing, while the costs of counsel’s preparation was only $6,400.

Earlier in his decision, the judge said that the primary role for counsel was to prepare and draft pleadings and submissions after receiving instructions about the facts. A matter such as this did not require the involvement of four solicitors in the drafting of pleadings and submissions, he said.

“One of the significant concerns in our society is the cost of access to justice.

“It is not surprising that individuals and small businesses would find it difficult to obtain access to justice where four lawyers at a solicitor’s firm were each charging different, but substantial, amounts for doing what must involve repetitive work of looking at one another’s drafts, documents or other communications, all of which, ultimately, would be, and were intended to be (and properly should have been), drafted and settled by counsel,” Justice Rares said.

Excesses like this are not isolated to Pipers, Justice Rares added, remarking that large law firms tended to approach modern litigation with little regard for time and cost. He said the estimates of this case also exemplified a more general model for solicitors to do work which should be undertaken at cheaper costs by barristers, which can lead to forensically useless efforts.

“If solicitors do the significant amounts of drafting work involved in the estimates, it becomes much more difficult for counsel to delete or jettison that material, if counsel decides that some, or often much, of it is irrelevant or unnecessary,” Justice Rares said.

“After all, by then the solicitor’s client has been charged for what is very often forensically useless and would never have been included in the drafting process, had that process been in the control of the advocate from the beginning, as used to be the position,” he said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Court rebukes ‘waste’ of lawyers piled on bankruptcy matter
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Quentin Bryce
06:05
DV has worsened in a generation: Quentin Bryce
Former governor-general of Australia Dame Quentin Bryce AD CVO has spoken of her deep distress about...
Lawyers
06:00
Academics entertain the idea of law without lawyers
Researchers from Queensland will explore some of the most disruptive trends tipped to transform the ...
Please, Continue (Hamlet), Melbourne Festival
Oct 16 2017
Hamlet suffers slings and arrows of top Victorian barristers
Victorian judges and barristers have performed the unique play Please, Continue (Hamlet) at the Melb...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...