find the latest legal job
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Honours split in Deacons HK partner showdown

Honours split in Deacons HK partner showdown

WARRING FIRMS Deacons and White & Case each claimed vindication after a long-awaited verdict on partner poaching claims against the US giant was delivered by a Hong Kong judge last week.The…

WARRING FIRMS Deacons and White & Case each claimed vindication after a long-awaited verdict on partner poaching claims against the US giant was delivered by a Hong Kong judge last week.

The Hong Kong High Court determined that Deacons was entitled to pursue damages against the firm it nearly merged with in 1999, finding that White & Case encouraged two high profile partners to jump ship. But while Deacons will now seek “substantial damages and legal costs” at a further hearing, White & Case can continue to act for a number of blue chip clients who made the simultaneous switch.

Judge David Gill said the two lawyers in question, Mark Fairburn and Edward Cairns, failed to comply with obligations incumbent upon them as partners of Deacons and were in fact encouraged to do so by the co-defendant firm.

Describing White & Case’s conduct as “below the belt”, Gill also concluded that the pair, with further encouragement from their current employer, attempted to persuade Deacons clients, including KPMG and Standard Chartered, to join them.

In Gill’s words, the actions of White & Case amounted to a “cynical disregard for the rights of Deacons, putting profit before honour”.

“It is below the belt,” the judgement added.

The court, however, rejected a number of claims from Deacons, most significantly refusing to grant an injunction preventing White & Case from acting on behalf of the subject clients. Gill reasoned that, keeping in mind the duration of proceedings, granting the application would unfairly intrude upon the clients’ interests.

He also dispensed with any suggestion that White & Case had breached a “non-solicitation” clause signed by the firms during merger discussions.

“I cannot go so far as to find that it was vindictive, or malicious ... and I am not, objectively, filled with a sense of outrage,” he said, before adding: “There was ... no solicitation by White & Case ... and thus no breach of the non-solicitation restrictions.”

Despite not recording a perfect sweep of all its claims before the court, Deacons was nevertheless delighted with the outcome.

“The wrongs committed by White & Case and two former partners of our firm ... were extremely serious and our decision to commence proceedings has been vindicated by today’s judgement,” managing partner Lindsay Esler said. “For a large law firm, in the full knowledge of its senior management, to have acted in such a way is beyond comprehension. We felt it important to make the point its behaviour was wrong.”

Adversary White & Case also described the judgement as vindicating, and predicted ultimate vindication would be achieved upon appeal, which it plans to “vigorously pursue”.

“White & Case is gratified that the judgement handed down Friday by Judge Gill in the Deacons dispute vindicates our position in key areas, especially the rights of clients to select the law firms of their choice,” a statement issued by the firm read.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Honours split in Deacons HK partner showdown
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 24 2017
Demand lifts in 2017/18 for short-term finance to cover crises
Promoted by NWC Finance. The first five months of the 2017-18 financial year have seen unpreceden...
LCA welcomes religious freedom panel
Nov 24 2017
LCA welcomes religious freedom panel
The Law Council of Australia says the establishment of a panel which will examine the human right to...
Law Society launched a new website, legal politics and lawmaking
Nov 24 2017
Law Society launches project to engage young Aussies
The Law Society of NSW has launched a new website to engage young Australians in legal politics and ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...