find the latest legal job
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Robertson hits back on bill of rights

Robertson hits back on bill of rights

Pre-eminent human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson hit back at opponents of a statutory bill of rights at talk delivered on Wednesday 1 April.In his talk, delivered at the City Recital Hall in…

Pre-eminent human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson hit back at opponents of a statutory bill of rights at talk delivered on Wednesday 1 April.

In his talk, delivered at the City Recital Hall in Sydney, Robertson responded first to the argument that given Australia's good human rights performance, we don't need a bill of rights.

Robertson pointed out that Australia doesn't perform as well on many human rights indicators as people might expect - for example, the Freedom House Index of Global Press Freedoms ranks Australia just 39th in the world, while the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Index ranks Australia 21st.

"We don't have an awful record, we do quite well," Robertson conceded. "But we don't do as well as we think we do, and we aren't as good as we might be."

Robertson also responded to the argument that a statutory bill of rights would give too much power to unelected judges at the expense of an elected parliament. A claim, he said, that is argued "most precipitously by unelected journalists".

The fact that politicians are elected, Robertson said, "doesn't mean they should be able to do anything they want", and he pointed out that the reason for having an unelected judiciary is to act a check on political power.

"It's part of the democratic system to have unelected judges and journalists keeping the buggers honest," he said.

Robertson pointed out that - unlike the position in the US or Canada - the Australian Government is only contemplating a statutory bill of rights and has expressly excluded constitutional change.

Judges would not, therefore, have the power to knock down laws they deemed to be inconsistent with the bill of rights - they would only have power to make declarations - declarations which the government could choose to ignore.

"This doesn't seem to me to be giving huge amounts of power to judges," he said. "It provides the courts with better principles to make fairer decisions."

Finally, he challenged the argument that has been put forward by some media organisations that a bill of rights is being pushed for by lawyers only because it would provide them with a "banquet" of work. Robertson pointed out that "there are lawyers and there are lawyers", explaining that while there are lawyers who work in large corporate law firms who earn a lot of money, they won't be the ones deriving work from a bill of rights.

The lawyers who will do so, Robertson argued, aren't in it for the money. They work in public interest originations such as legal aid, community legal centers and the Aboriginal Legal Service, where salaries are often less than those of mid-level journalists.

"The argument that [a bill of rights] will be a banquet for lawyers is an argument that doesn't understand the legal profession," he said.

Robertson's talk was an out-of-season event forming part of the Sydney Writers Festival, which officially kicks off in May.

- By Zoe Lyon

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Robertson hits back on bill of rights
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 24 2017
Demand lifts in 2017/18 for short-term finance to cover crises
Promoted by NWC Finance. The first five months of the 2017-18 financial year have seen unpreceden...
LCA welcomes religious freedom panel
Nov 24 2017
LCA welcomes religious freedom panel
The Law Council of Australia says the establishment of a panel which will examine the human right to...
Law Society launched a new website, legal politics and lawmaking
Nov 24 2017
Law Society launches project to engage young Aussies
The Law Society of NSW has launched a new website to engage young Australians in legal politics and ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...