find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Data theft in the workplace

Data theft in the workplace

MODERN technology makes our lives easier. Much of the day-to-day running of our personal and professional lives is dependent on the software and data on our computers, laptops, PDAs, and even…

MODERN technology makes our lives easier. Much of the day-to-day running of our personal and professional lives is dependent on the software and data on our computers, laptops, PDAs, and even mobile phones.

But with new technology comes a new threat — storage devices such as USB sticks, portable hard drives, mobile phones and even iPods are capable vehicles for data theft in many businesses.

The theft of intellectual property from the workplace is on the rise, and the recent 2008 Information Security Breaches survey of more than 1000 businesses conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers in Britain illustrates just how much of a risk businesses are taking with their company information.

The results show that since 2006, 6 per cent of businesses had suffered a breach of confidentiality; 35 per cent have no control over staff instant messaging; 52 per cent don’t carry out a formal risk assessment; 84 per cent do not scan outgoing emails for confidential data; 47 per cent of large businesses experienced staff misuse of information systems; and 34 per cent of large businesses experienced theft or fraud involving computers.

Alarmingly, the survey reports that 67 per cent of businesses do nothing to prevent company information leaving on USB storage devices. Uncontrolled use of such devices is a very real risk. It only takes one USB stick to upload a virus onto a system or, worse yet, to copy all the company’s sensitive commercial data. The repercussions are serious: business and financial loss; embarrassment; and where client confidentiality is paramount, irreversible damage to reputation and a raft of potential legal risks.

In Strickett v Arthur (2 December 1994, Employment Court, Wellington WEC 62/94, W28/94, Judge Finnigan), two workers left their employer’s business to set up their own business. Not only was the business in direct competition with the employer’s, but they were also using information such as client addresses and work records they had taken from the employer’s computer before leaving. The employees did not even leave copies of this data on the system.

If an employer believes an employee is carrying out an unlawful activity, reviewing the employee’s email system is the first place to start. Engaging the services of forensic computer experts is the next step. A pretext must be found for taking the employee’s laptop or computer and the employer must act fast. Once secured, experts can establish whether the suspect has recently acquired any removable data; whether emails containing references to confidential company information have been received, sent and subsequently deleted; and whether documents referencing sensitive data or confidential client information have been created and deleted.

In every employment relationship there are common law duties, one of which places an obligation on employees not to use or disclose their employer’s confidential information. This obligation operates whether written into the employment agreement or not, and continues after the employment has ended. Employers might consider exit interviews with employees, where confidentiality, restraint of trade and policy could be discussed and reiterated.

NZLawyer, issue 92, July 2008

Carisse de Beer is a law clerk at McCaw Lewis Chapman, New Zealand

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Data theft in the workplace
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Consultation
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
IBA
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Queensland University of Technology, ruby milestone
Oct 23 2017
Queensland law school reaches ruby milestone
Celebrating 40 years since establishing a law course in 1977, the Queensland University of Technolog...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...