find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Director’s defence for insolvent trading proposed

Director’s defence for insolvent trading proposed

A new defence proposed could allow directors to restructure an insolvent company.The Law Council of Australia's (LCA) proposal has been met with support from insolvency specialists such as Scott…

A new defence proposed could allow directors to restructure an insolvent company.

The Law Council of Australia's (LCA) proposal has been met with support from insolvency specialists such as Scott Butler, partner at McCullough Robertson.

In a letter to the Federal Minister for Financial Services Chris Bowen, the LCA has appealed for a defence to be introduced that permits director to restructure an insolvent company - provided appropriate advice based on accurate accounts has been obtained to form an honest business judgement.

But the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) suggested on Tuesday that company directors should face tougher penalties if firms go bust without sufficient provision for their employees, citing statistics that 5000 workers each week were forecast to lose their jobs over the next 12 months.

Butler said that adopting such a hard-line position could be problematic.

"If companies are forced to set aside sufficient money at all times, to meet all accrued employee entitlements, then they are not going to be able to use that money as working capital and that will severely affect their ability to trade, their ability to expand, to buy plants and equipment and essentially their ability to employee more people," he said.

Butler said the majority of directors who trade whilst insolvent are those in small to medium companies who don't generally obtain appropriate advice.

"Or if they do obtain some advice it's generally not based on accurate accounts, because they just don't keep their house in order, so this new defence won't assist them," he said.

"The new defence is really aimed at public companies and large private companies whose directors, in my experience, take their insolvent trading responsibility seriously.

"They take proper advice before undertaking any course of action and I think this new business judgment defence would maintain the objectives of the current law which is to prevent people trading whilst insolvent but at the same time, without impeding honest efforts of restructuring, based on professional advice."

According to the LCA, when restructuring is available it produces a superior outcome for all stakeholders - the business can continue to trade without the risk that commercial contracts will be cancelled, sale of the business is avoided, employees redundancies are minimized and ordinary creditors continue to be paid in full.

Butler said he would also support the introduction of a defence based on the UK model, where directors are held personally liable if there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation and they don't minimise the potential loss to the company's creditors.

"That sort of law places a focus on the outcome at the end of the day, rather than our law which currently places the focus on the company's current solvency," he said.

"There has been some criticism though of the UK model ... that it's too easy, potentially, for directors to avoid liability by showing that there was some reasonable prospect of the company avoiding insolvent liquidation at the end of the day. So that's why I think this new defence suggested by the Law Council is a good compromise."

- Sarah Sharples

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Director’s defence for insolvent trading proposed
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Queensland University of Technology, ruby milestone
Queensland law school reaches ruby milestone
Celebrating 40 years since establishing a law course in 1977, the Queensland University of Technolog...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...