find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Universities put on notice over IP rights

Universities put on notice over IP rights

The decision of the Full Federal Court handed down on Thursday on the intellectual property rights concerning inventions made by university professors has been criticised as out of touch with…

The decision of the Full Federal Court handed down on Thursday on the intellectual property rights concerning inventions made by university professors has been criticised as out of touch with modern scientific practices, say legal experts.

Allens Arthur Robinson partner Richard Hamer said the decision in University of Western Australia v Gray that there could be a duty to conduct research, but not to invent, in an academic environment, seemed anachronistic.

He argued that the Federal Court's findings appeared to be rooted in 19th century British concepts that saw academic research and invention as two different fields.

"Academic research was an 'ivory tower' occupied by pure academics who published research but did not file patents, while inventions occurred in a workshop occupied by practical workmen of industry," he said.

"This aspect of the decision is quite out of touch with modern scientific research practices, where research and invention are usually two aspects of the same work performed by the same people."

The case involved Dr Bruce Gray, who was appointed to the University of WA in 1985 and in the course of his research developed a number of cancer treatment technologies.

After ceasing full-time employment at the university in 1997, Gray assigned the IP rights to the inventions to a third party for commercial purposes.

The university argued that there was an implied term in the employment contract that meant the IP belonged to the university.

Hamer said the court's decision in University of Western Australia v Gray meant that universities should now ensure academic contracts contain express provisions that deal with any IP produced by academics.

Middletons intellectual property partner Jane Owen said the judgement was a strong declaration of a general principle of academic freedom to research and own IP in the research - free of any entitlement of the university. She said the decision could have implications beyond universities.

"The typecasting of academics who invent as a special class of employee could be extended to other research institutions, especially those funded by the public purse. Freedoms on publication and collaboration are key indicators of this potential," she said.

Hamer and Owen both warned that third parties would also need to take care.

"Third parties engaging in collaborative research with university academics and other public institutions should conduct due diligence to ensure that clear title to research outcomes can be achieved and seek appropriate warranties to cover this type of situation," Owen said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Universities put on notice over IP rights
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...