find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
NSW toughens up on frivolous law suits

NSW toughens up on frivolous law suits

New legislation will be introduced in New South Wales in an effort to prevent people bringing unmeritorious law suits, New South Wales Attorney General John Hatzistergos has announced.The…

New legislation will be introduced in New South Wales in an effort to prevent people bringing unmeritorious law suits, New South Wales Attorney General John Hatzistergos has announced.

The legislation will make it easier for orders to be made against people — known as “vexatious litigants” — who abuse the judicial process by bringing frivolous law suits for the purpose of harassing or intimidating others.

Hatzistergos estimates that only around 13 people in New South Wales have had vexatious litigant orders made against them to date, and he believes that aspects of the current legislation pose a barrier to having a greater number of legitimate orders made.

“The threshold is very, very strict before a person can actually have an order made against them,” Hatzistergos said. “At the moment that high threshold is an inhibiting factor to bringing vexatious litigation proceedings, and, by and large, that’s been recognised by the fact that such few proceedings have been brought.”

The current threshold, set out in section 84 of the Supreme Court Act 1974 (NSW), only allows an order to be made against a person who “habitually and persistently and without any reasonable ground” institutes vexatious legal proceedings. The reforms now proposed by the New South Wales government would see that threshold lowered considerably, to allow an order to also be made against a person who “frequently” brings such proceedings.

In addition, the reforms seek to broaden the range of people who can bring proceedings to have an order made against a vexatious litigant. Under the current regime, only the Attorney General or a “person aggrieved” have that ability.

However under the proposed new legislation, Hatzistergos explained, proceedings could also be brought by the Solicitor General, the registrar of the court, and — with leave of the court — anyone with a sufficient interest in the matter. In addition to the Supreme Court, orders will be able to be made in the Land and Environment Court and the Industrial Relations Commission.

The new legislation would also expand the range of matters that the court can take into account, allowing the court to consider not only proceedings that have been brought by a person in New South Wales, but also in any other Australian state or territory.

The court would also be given greater flexibility in terms of orders that it can make, including orders staying all or part of the current proceedings, prohibiting a person from instituting proceedings or prohibiting a person from instituting certain types of proceedings.

Although he isn’t certain about the exact number, Hatzistergos is confident that there are vexatious litigants currently slipping through the system.

“The number of vexatious litigants we have at the moment is relatively small. Although that doesn’t necessarily mean that the court’s unchallenged by persons bringing multiple proceedings — often not for the purpose of having a meritorious law suit adjudicated on, but for the purpose of intimidating, embarrassing or harassing,” he said.

“I’ve sent out consultation letters to various stakeholders and the response I’ve received so far has been overwhelmingly positive. It’s difficult to know the precise effect that this will have, though, on the basis of the responses that I’ve had, I’m confident that there will be a response.” he said.

The changes will bring New South Wales into line with Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory, who have already fallen into line with national model laws.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

NSW toughens up on frivolous law suits
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Jetski
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Consultation
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
IBA
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...