find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Question mark still hangs over incorporation

Question mark still hangs over incorporation

THE BENEFITS of incorporation to law firms are many and varied, but serious questions about potential conflicts of interest are yet to be answered. All eyes in the industry are on listed firms…

THE BENEFITS of incorporation to law firms are many and varied, but serious questions about potential conflicts of interest are yet to be answered.

All eyes in the industry are on listed firms Slater & Gordon and Integrated Legal Holdings as they test the waters of the commercial market.

Last week at an industry-based seminar hosted by ALPMA | NSW and QL, senior lawyers expressed concern about the possibility of a conflict of interest between a lawyer’s corporate responsibility and their duty to the court.

Legal Services Commissioner Steve Marks voiced similar concerns when incorporation was first introduced in 2001. And while fears about conflicting interests are being addressed directly by Slater & Gordon and Integrated Legal Holdings, the thorny issue is unlikely go away entirely.

As a listed firm, Slater & Gordon felt the potential conflict was real enough to warrant a mention in their prospectus documentation. Section 7 of the prospectus for shareholders states that Slater & Gordon lawyers have a primary duty to the courts, and may be “required to act against the interests of shareholders or the short-term profitability of the company”.

However, balancing any conflict between these duties in real terms could prove problematic, according to Ian Ramsay, the director of the Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation at Melbourne University. Ramsay has also practised law with firms Sullivan & Cromwell in New York and Mallesons Stephen Jaques in Sydney.

“Interests of the company are typically defined by courts as a duty for directors to act in the best interests of the company. The courts typically define the interests of the company as the interests of the shareholders, not the company’s clients,” he said.

“So, in a theoretical sense, if this ever arose, if Slater & Gordon did have to act contrary to the interests of shareholders and its corporate responsibilities then there would be an issue for the law firm.”

Other routine conflicts will need to be managed as incorporated firms set about acquiring other legal practices, and in doing so, new clients.

“The one [conflict] that’s always been around for all law firms is the conflicts of interests between clients of the law firm. But what you’ll find with incorporated law firms is that there can be an ongoing process of integration. By integration I mean taking over other firms, and merging in other law firms in order to gain more clients,” Ramsay explained.

“The more you acquire other law firms — and of course we see that with Slater & Gordon — then the more there is the potential for more conflicts between clients of the law firm.”

An entirely new conflict arises from the public listing of law firms. The process of listing introduces new shareholders to the company. It is foreseeable that a shareholder could be on the opposite side of litigation against one of the firm’s clients.

“Again, that would be a relatively new development, if you like. I’m not suggesting that it can’t be managed. But it would be a new one in that sense,” Ramsay said.

The untested regulatory framework and the lag in academic research in the area means that these and other conflicts arising from incorporation and listing will have to be managed by law firms as they arise. It is a decidedly ad hoc approach in a profession unaccustomed to such unknowns.

Can an industry become more ethically sound as law firms move to incorporate? See our feature on page 24

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Question mark still hangs over incorporation
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...