find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Japanese whaling on Government's legal menu

Japanese whaling on Government's legal menu

A challenge to the legality of Japan's whaling program by the Australian Government has a high chance of success in the international courts, say experts.Speaking at the Pirates of the Southern…

A challenge to the legality of Japan's whaling program by the Australian Government has a high chance of success in the international courts, say experts.

Speaking at the Pirates of the Southern Seas forum at the Australian National University last week, leading international law academics came together to discuss legal, political and diplomatic issues surrounding Australia's stance on Japan's whaling policy.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly, ANU Professor Donald Rothwell said the Australian Government should steer clear of seeking legal action under domestic laws, and instead take their case to either the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).

"The first option the Government would seek to pursue is to obtain provisional measures, in other words an international injunction, from the courts," he said.

"The chances of success for such an injunction ... would seem to be very high in this case. All you need to [prove] are two things: that the court has prima facie jurisdiction - and that would certainly be the case here - and that there is an urgency about the issuing of the provisional measures."

Considering that decisions in the ICJ can take between five and seven years to be handed down, Rothwell believes it's likely that provisional measures would be granted to prevent Japan from continuing with the program while its legality is questioned.

However, according to Rothwell, whether a substantive victory would be secured is less certain.

"The grounds for the issuing of provisional measures are particularly strong [but] the chances of success ultimately depend on the legal grounds on which Australia would seek to frame its case before the court," he said.

"All one can really do is speculate upon that, because the Australian Government hasn't given any clear indication as to how it might seek to frame the argument."

While numerous experts at the forum queried the "diplomatic wisdom" of Australia taking Japan to the international courts on such a sensitive issue, it was acknowledged by many that future legal action is more likely than not.

"The Australian Government may well have backed itself into a corner as a result of threatening to take legal action in that it is now left with little option but to do so, unless some of its conditions or demands have been met," said Rothwell.

Numerous decisive factors are still in play, however, including reformation of the International Whaling Committee (IWC) which is set to hold its next meeting in Morocco in June this year.

"The situation is now so fluid with respect to the ongoing reform of the IWC that much will depend upon the next meeting," he said.

"Subject to any agreements that are reached there, we should have a much clearer sense as to how the Australian Government might choose to proceed."

Claire Chaffey

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Japanese whaling on Government's legal menu
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...