find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Document destruction ban urged

Document destruction ban urged

A REPORT commissioned by the Victorian Government has recommended that people who destroy documents relevant to court cas

A REPORT commissioned by the Victorian Government has recommended that people who destroy documents relevant to court cases should face criminal charges.

Document Destruction and Civil Litigation in Victoria is the result of a review commissioned by the Victorian Attorney General, which was prompted by court action brought by cancer sufferer Rolah McCabe against British American Tobacco.

Conducted by Crown Counsel for Victoria, Professor Peter Sallmann, the report suggests creating a new criminal offence covering destruction of documents before and after the start of legal proceedings. “This statute would deal with the worst and most blatant instances of the destruction of material relevant to civil litigation and would cover highly negligent destructions as well as intentional ones,” Sallmann said in the report.

Sallmann also called for judges to be given discretionary powers to strike out all or part of a claim where a document has been destroyed.

A third key proposal is that there should be a new professional conduct regulation as there is in NSW. This should apply where advice is given by lawyers to clients about document retention and destruction as well as in situations where lawyers themselves are in possession of relevant material.

McCabe, now deceased, suffered from lung cancer, which she attributed to the smoking over many years of cigarettes produced by the British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited (BAT). She sued BAT for personal injuries caused by its alleged negligence and claimed damages.

Victorian Supreme Court judge Geoffrey Eames found that documents that would have helped McCabe’s case against British American Tobacco had been destroyed. Her estate was therefore awarded $700,000. But BAT appealed against the decision and the Court of Appeal said the destruction of documents in the McCabe case was not unlawful because it took place before legal proceedings.

Law Institute of Victoria (LIV) CEO John Cain told Lawyers Weekly the LIV supported Sallmann’s proposal to impose a criminal offence in certain circumstances. The LIV would approach the A-G so that it could be involved in the legislation, Cain said.

Attorney General Rob Hulls commissioned the report following the case. He requested that Sallmann “examine the current law, procedures and practices of discovery in the conduct of civil litigation in Victoria”.

“You are requested to give particular attention to the need for fair trials in civil litigation in Victoria, and what the appropriate role for the courts should be in ensuring the fairness of proceedings when relevant documentary evidence has been destroyed,” Hulls wrote in a letter to Sallmann.

It seemed “wrong and rather odd”, Sallmann said, that an organisation or individual would destroy material that could be relevant to anticipated litigation and then “get away with it”.

“This seems to be what the Court of Appeal decision in McCabe amounts to,” he writes. “It strikes me that this is a narrow, somewhat artificial, technical and unfair test to be imported into the civil justice arena from the criminal law.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Document destruction ban urged
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...