find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Immunity hangs in the balance

Immunity hangs in the balance

AS THE High Court considered whether barristers could retain their immunity for negligence last week, the profession waited with bated breath.While the Court reserved its decision on the…

AS THE High Court considered whether barristers could retain their immunity for negligence last week, the profession waited with bated breath.

While the Court reserved its decision on the immunity question, which will determine whether Ryan D’Orta-Ekenaike could proceed with a negligence claim against his barrister, the president of Australia’s peak legal body said the implications of the case could be considerable.

Under current Australian law, a barrister cannot be sued for a poor performance in court. It is a common law immunity from suit by a client in respect of anything that the advocate omits to do in conducting the client’s case in court, Law Council president Bob Gotterson explained.

“For lots of advocates the immunity doesn’t operate with regard to most of the stuff they do,” Gotterson said.

The implications of the current situation can be felt on a number of different levels, Gotterson said. Firstly, it means that advocates can conduct cases freely and independently “without the chilling spectre of litigation hanging over them”.

From the court perspective, it means they are not called upon to retry cases over the presentation of a case that the court has already tried, Gotterson said. Also, the court knows that the advocates can discharge their overriding duty to the court without complicating concerns about civil liability.

In NZ, a reason given for maintaining barristers’ immunity was that judges sensed there is a strong public policy interest in ensuring that lawyers were always free to take the hopeless cases in court, said public law expert Colin Keating from NZ firm Chen Palmer & Partners.

Keating claimed in a TVNZ breakfast show interview in January that “at the end of the day there are always going to be some clients of lawyers who are poorly treated by their barristers and will have genuine grievances and will be seeking some sort of accountability. There is a human rights angle to that … If it is good enough for accountants and plumbers and solicitors, why not barristers?” Keating said.

As seven justices considered the case of D’Orta-Ekenaike, who claims to have been wrongly advised to plead guilty in a rape case, Justice Michael Kirby said “I just have to tell you … the rest of the community, including the rest of the professional community, regards this as the courts looking after their own”.

Law Council president Gotterson said that changes to the current situation could mean a working court would be conducted with a scrupulous eye to possible liability consequences. “This could well mean adding expense as more and more time is spent checking out every nook and cranny.”

Also, for the barrister, Gotterson said, “discharging the overriding duty to the court would be complicated by considerations of self exposure to civil liability”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Immunity hangs in the balance
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice, ALA, right-to-die law
‘Right-to-die’ laws would be a relief for terminally ill: ALA
The passage of an assisted dying bill through the lower house of Victorian Parliament has been haile...
Diversity top of agenda for future WA Law Society president
The advancement of diversity in the Western Australian legal profession will be one of the key items...
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...