find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Crime and punishment

Crime and punishment

Morally wrong, yes, but breaking the law, not necessarily. Maddocks partner Rob Gregory looks at the downloads dilemma.

Unlike some, I don't support the notion that if a movie, TV show or album is too expensive, it's ok to download it. In the same way as it's not ok to sneak into a cinema or a gig if I don't like the ticket price.  We're talking about entertainment here, not a lifesaving drug which a patent owner is refusing to make.

But, despite what the copyright owners' associations would have you believe, copyright infringement by downloading for personal use is not theft and it's not a crime. 

Theft is when you permanently deprive the owner of their property, like stealing a DVD from a shop.  Once you've stolen it, it's gone and the shopkeeper can't sell it to someone else.

When you download an episode of Game of Thrones without paying for it, you're infringing the copyright and committing a civil wrong, but you don't stop the owners of GoT from selling another copy of the episode to a paying customer, such as me.

So by helping to limit downloaded copyright infringement, which is presumably intended to encourage people to buy more legitimate content, the Government can help copyright owners make a lot of additional revenue. 

As there's no additional cost, that's pure profit straight to their bottom line. 

That's great for the copyright owners and, to an extent, the rest of the economy as they and their employees pay more tax, spend more on lavish parties and generally push the cash around the global economy.

 If the copyright owners actually pay tax in Australia or employ people who pay tax or go to lavish parties in Australia, some of that might even stay here.

So far, so good. 

Maybe even the "Australia Tax" on legitimately streamed movies, TV shows and music might be reduced so we pay something more like what the rest of the world pays for them.

But why do the internet service providers (ISPs) have to help out for free?

 

Paying a higher price for ethical behaviour

Of course, it's not free.  What it really means is that people like me who don't download infringing material will have to pay more for our Internet connections to subsidise the copyright owners' unpaid police force.

Normally in our society when you infringe another person's civil rights they can just sue you for the damages you've caused them.

That's a touch inconvenient for copyright owners, who'd apparently have to sue lots of people for little bits of money. 

Much easier for them to go after choke points like the ISPs and make them do the hard work.  Even better if the ISPs have to pay for it too. 

Unfortunately for them, the High Court didn't agree. 

Funnily enough, the High Court doesn't think that just because the ISP supplies you an internet connection, it 'authorises' you to run rampant with the downloads.  The ISPs also weren't too keen on snooping on their customers internet traffic at the copyright owner's request without any actual, you know, evidence that something was up.

This all makes sense to me, but the Attorney General seems to think it’s a problem that needs to be fixed.  If the problem is serious enough for the copyright owners, perhaps they could pay the ISPs some of their additional profit to help?

There's still the small issue that I'd prefer that my ISP didn't monitor everything I do with my internet connection,  just on the off chance that I (or someone else in my house) might be being doing something naughty. 

Despite the lessons Germany learnt about pervasive "public safety" surveillance from the Stasi [in East Germany during the Cold War], the argument on that one seems to have been lost.

So what's next?  Everyone knows that Bangkok, Beijing and Bali are full of knock offs.  Perhaps the airlines should have to search their passengers' bodies and bags (at the passenger's cost) to stem the flood of fake Gucci?

 

Rob Gregory (pictured) is a partner in Maddocks TMT practice and a non-executive director of the Internet Society of Australia.  

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Crime and punishment
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...