SME Law

How to... resolve litigation

Norton Rose Australia partner Grant Bonner offers insight into the recently settled but very complex Tcard litigation.

March 20, 2012 • By Grant Bonner

Share this article on:

Norton Rose Australia partner Grant Bonner offers insight into the recently settled but very complex Tcard litigation.

This content is available exclusively to Lawyers Weekly premium members.

INDIVIDUAL

Yearly

$ 49.00

per year

SUBSCRIBE NOW

INDIVIDUAL

Monthly

$ 5.00

per month

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Learn more about Premium Benefits and other offers

Username or Email

Password Forgot password?

Keep me signed in on this device.

The recently settled Tcard litigation involved claims for public interest immunity, appeals to the Court of Appeal, use of the special counsel procedure, the discovery of over 1.2 million documents and the evidence of 46 lay witnesses. Moreover, the litigation was settled – averting the need for a 20-week trial in the Supreme Court – with the defendants paying only $5 million in damages after a $150 million suit was brought against them. Norton Rose Australia acted for the two defendants in the case.

Got a tip for us?

If you have any news tips or stories to share, feel free to send them our way.